I am one of those 87 octane users, have no issues, but don't drive it hard at all.Run 93, with 87 your engine will be pulling timing every time you get on it to prevent pre ignition/detonation.
people have done the logs, frankly 93 is barely adequate for this compression level, and that’s where you’ll see the cars even happier on E30.
some owners flat out don’t care and run 87…
Could never be me though.
On the Rap it’s something like .3 seconds to 60mph. Modern engine management is a marvel of technology and engineering in that you can run on cr@p gas in Mexico all the way through top tier super unleaded and the vehicle adjusts for you.Run 93, with 87 your engine will be pulling timing every time you get on it to prevent pre ignition/detonation.
people have done the logs, frankly 93 is barely adequate for this compression level, and that’s where you’ll see the cars even happier on E30.
some owners flat out don’t care and run 87…
Could never be me though.
You won’t know if the car likes it more -or less- until you run a few consecutive tanks of fuel through it.I am one of those 87 octane users, have no issues, but don't drive it hard at all.
https://www.fordservicecontent.com/...ingEnabled=False&userMarket=USA&buildtype=webThe manuals for the Eco-Boost and GT alike, specifically states 91 or higher octane be used!!
Been 7,500 miles last summer, no issues. Again I do not drive it "like I stole it", saving that for March in NC, those will be driven differently than my own.On the Rap it’s something like .3 seconds to 60mph. Modern engine management is a marvel of technology and engineering in that you can run on cr@p gas in Mexico all the way through top tier super unleaded and the vehicle adjusts for you.
As gear heads, we are pretty spoiled.
You won’t know if the car likes it more -or less- until you run a few consecutive tanks of fuel through it.