@AZ_Ryan as wellAh, so direct conflict with risks experience at 289° and no limp mode. Strange, unless, of course, the inferred oil temperature is not the culprit in turning on limp mode.
What I mean is, the two different experiences could be explained by MustangNoob being at 280 and krisk being at 289, but a different input (CHT? Transmission temp?) threw MustangNoob's car into limp mode while krisk kept rocking right along at a higher inferred oil temperature.
Yep. The oil is cooler than the ECU makes it appear on your display.My car is a non performance pack with an oil cooler installed from Ford performance. And yes, I did not see any oil temperature differences before and after the oil cooler installation. And yes the oil overheated even after installing the oil cooler. Was the oil temperature reading real with the oil cooler real ? - probably not ...I measured the input / output of the oil cooler and it had about 30 degrees difference ,which means the cooler is working but the system/algorithm does not take it into account
Wow, you are not kidding about a long road trip with a trailered track car. South Georgia to New York.long road trip in June/July to VIR, Watkins Glen and Summit Point.
2,155 miles calculated from home to each track then back. I figure by the time we travel back and forth between the track and hotel/restaurants, the trip will be over 2,500 miles. It should be fun, though.Wow, you are not kidding about a long road trip with a trailered track car. South Georgia to New York.
You'd have to datalog the car to see what is exactly happeningIs it possible that the ECU is starting to detect detonation at those elevated temps and triggering limp mode?