Zig
Well-Known Member
There’s that ‘you know why’ defense, one most complex to refute.You know why. It is locked for a reason which you also know.
Sponsored
There’s that ‘you know why’ defense, one most complex to refute.You know why. It is locked for a reason which you also know.
But they let you modulate the climate control. Are they also unable to permit limited access to specific functions? Why can’t i make adjustments to identified variables, even limited to a range is the same as twisting a screw or setting a jet. When the gov vehicles don’t have the requirement neither should the civilian otherwise it would seem to fall into one of those categories we aren’t usually able to civilly discuss.You know why. It is locked for a reason which you also know.
Complete rubbish. You know why it is locked down.But they let you modulate the climate control. Are they also unable to permit limited access to specific functions? Why can’t i make adjustments to identified variables, even limited to a range is the same as twisting a screw or setting a jet. When the gov vehicles don’t have the requirement neither should the civilian otherwise it would seem to fall into one of those categories we aren’t usually able to civilly discuss.
If you haven't worked it out by now you never will!There’s that ‘you know why’ defense, one most complex to refute.
Are you kidding me? That run was cracking 9s. Cracking 9s is done with about 740 whp. That's not even close to 1000 whp. I thought you'd atleast come back with the Lethal Performance car that runs over 800 whp.
That's the record holderAre you kidding me? That run was cracking 9s. Cracking 9s is done with about 740 whp. That's not even close to 1000 whp. I thought you'd atleast come back with the Lethal Performance car that runs over 800 whp.
You're probably the only one on this site that consider any of those uphill. Robvas is right quality of cars has gone to shit. I've got more rattles in my 24 Mustang than I do in my 16 Camaro. It was the same way with my 23 Golf R before I got rid of it for the Mustang.Don't buy one then.
Ford don't do the last of those and data can be controlled (better in Europe).
The others are a fine by me.
Many consider these uphill not downhill!
Oh the ‘safety’ cap reason? Same reason a safety is recommended with firearms, same reason medication has a childproof cap?Complete rubbish. You know why it is locked down.
My 24 has no rattles at all, better than my 19.You're probably the only one on this site that consider any of those uphill. Robvas is right quality of cars has gone to shit. I've got more rattles in my 24 Mustang than I do in my 16 Camaro. It was the same way with my 23 Golf R before I got rid of it for the Mustang.
You're one of the lucky ones then because there are quite a few on here that have them. I've had misaligned panels too that I had to readjust to my liking. Quality isn't there but I'm willing to overlook it for now because I want to dabble in the coyote platform for a bit.My 24 has no rattles at all, better than my 19.
tuning and stealing are 2 different things not really related.Dodges are getting stolen by poorly encrypted systems allowing people to program fake keys in less than 2 minutes
Chevys are getting stolen by smashing a window and pulling a fucking fuse
Kias are being stolen with a screwdriver and USB stick
and yall are wondering why Ford is encrypting the ECU?
in this case they are the same thing, remember the S650 is an FNV car, leaving the ECU unencrypted exposes a lot of potential weaknesses that can be exploited. Fords not trying to lock down tuning, theyre trying to secure your data to keep the cars from being stolen/exploited because that would cost them millions in class actions, the tuning being locked is just a byproduct the people are putting way too much emphasis on.tuning and stealing are 2 different things not really related.
15-23 mustangs are not as stolen as doges and those mustangs have tuning
but really is it fords better security or the crowd that wants them is different maybe both.