S650 is fast

[Q6543]

I did ran a 11.25 on a draggy and 0-60 was actually faster on a draggy at 3.60 instead of 3.63.

Then please post the dragy shots for us all.
That will help to answer questions of how/why

Sponsored

 

[Renntech]

I'm sorry but these numbers are nowhere in the world of reality, especially with 91 octane. You need to go to an actual dragstrip and get a printed timeslip. I promise you it's going to disappoint you. Ford's readouts so inaccurately represent the car's performance that it should be criminal lol.

The A10 S650 is well documented at running about 12.0-12.2 at 116-118ish. That's under ideal conditions, 93+ octane, and a solid 60 foot. Murphy's law garage has some of the best times I've seen at 11.8, and that's because he has 30% ethanol in the tank and expecting the wideband oxygen sensors to adapt the needed AFR, even though these aren't flexfuel equipped vehicles.

 

[Ace]

Yeah no, a stock Mustang can't run these numbers, as much as we like the cars. Guess you drove very downhill? Or post the dragy results.

 

[IceGamer]

I did ran a 11.25 on a draggy and 0-60 was actually faster on a draggy at 3.60 instead of 3.63.

For that kind of times the S650 needs at least some +100hp extra. The M3 competition with its extra 100ish HP over the S650 is barely able to produce these numbers (faster 0-60 but 11.5 on the ¼)...

 

[Loucas]

Are they as inaccurate as the C8 ones? Guys like speed phenom will post these crazy 2.X videos for those cars when you can sit there and count one one thousand up to 3 and the thing is not all that close to 60 yet. My Mach 1 0-60 timer seems pretty legit. Usually 4.4 to 4.6 on a normal road in drag mode. Saw 4.2 once on what I thought was about as perfect a run as I could get with warm tires and a nice fall day.

Those times seem realistic. I agree it seems legit.

 

[Upacurb]

Then please post the dragy shots for us all.
That will help to answer questions of how/why

This 100% - 11.20s on basically a stock car with drag radials on a non-prepped surface .....sorry I could maybe wrap my head around 11.60s considering people are dipping in the 11s stock on a prepped track - but 11.20s.....Im thinking the road was downhill.....

 

[robvas]

11.2 @ 120 is like a 1.5 - 1.6 60 foot time

Steeda went 11.2 @ 125 with a 1.7

 

[Q6543]

Kinda bummed not to see this dragy post, I’m sure there’s some good data

 

[Adamrx11]

Does a performance strut tower brace do anything special or is the OEM one basically the same?

 

[robvas]

Does a performance strut tower brace do anything special or is the OEM one basically the same?

That's probably 2 tenths all by itself. And then you have the K&N filters...

 

[Adamrx11]

That's probably 2 tenths all by itself. And then you have the K&N filters...

What makes it better than the OEM one??

 

[GhastlyTT]

What makes it better than the OEM one??

He's being facetious lol

 

[Zig]

Which update ?

 

[Mirtsevperforance70]

I'm sorry but these numbers are nowhere in the world of reality, especially with 91 octane. You need to go to an actual dragstrip and get a printed timeslip. I promise you it's going to disappoint you. Ford's readouts so inaccurately represent the car's performance that it should be criminal lol.

The A10 S650 is well documented at running about 12.0-12.2 at 116-118ish. That's under ideal conditions, 93+ octane, and a solid 60 foot. Murphy's law garage has some of the best times I've seen at 11.8, and that's because he has 30% ethanol in the tank and expecting the wideband oxygen sensors to adapt the needed AFR, even though these aren't flexfuel equipped vehicles.

Whatever u say man and I never said my car was 100 percent stock either. But believe what u wanna believe

 

[Renntech]

Whatever u say man and I never said my car was 100 percent stock either. But believe what u wanna believe

Here's a Dragy readout for my previous car. Similar 0-60mph, 60 foot, and quarter mile ET to what you're claiming your mustang can do. This was a BMW M6 with 605rwhp.

I don't need to "believe what I want to believe", I know the limitations of the car we BOTH HAVE. Filters and wide tires aren't gonna make it happen, the Ford SYNC4 readout is simply wrong. It seems everyone is willing to accept that but you You'd need way more power, or way less weight to hit those figures in an S650.

Sponsored