Gregs24
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 2,713
- Reaction score
- 1,498
- Location
- Wiltshire UK & Charente FR
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang V8 GT, Ford Kuga PHEV
Correct. She executed and successfully completed her brief on the car. If that was incorrect then blame the board at Honda for getting it wrong not her.I'm not sure that had anything to do with having a woman in charge. The problem was that Honda forgot what the NSX was about. It was NEVER intended to be a high tech show platform, it was intended to be a grounded driver's car. The second Gen NSX did EVERYTHING wrong in that aspect, even if it was decent on paper.
Think of it like when Top Gear voted the Lexus SC430 "The worst car in the history of the world". Not because it was necessarily a bad car, but because it was a car that didn't achieve ANYTHING that it intended to. It was a roadster that only looked like a roadster and handled like an Accord. THAT is what Honda achieved with the new NSX-precisely the opposite of what their audience wanted.
Honda would have been better off just relaunching the original NSX production lines and cranking out new copies of the original. Sure, it was underpowered and showing its age, but it was far more of a driver's car than the new iteration.
Honda and Toyota seem to have forgotten this lesson for the most part., and it wasn't only that woman that is guilty of this. They've done a decent job with the Civic-R and the Integra-S, but too often it's all about packing on tech and hybrid parts rather than producing the cars that their base wants.
Sponsored