HappySquirrel
W85 Whale Oil Tune
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 Mustang EB PP CO, 97 Pathfinder 4x4
I think you need to take into account that we're in a transitional period. People (especially many Mustang enthusiasts) still want their internal combustion engines, but we obviously need to transition to electric drivetrains for environmental and fuel supply reasons. I would favor going fully electric over the hybrid approach (even though that means I'll probably lose my manual transmission), but I suppose this is Ford's way of easing the enthusiast crowd into electric power.Im almost 50 and I think three different motors is too many. Its too many now and it would be too many then. I think a lot more QC should have went into the ecoboost. While i prefer the cyclone v6 to the ecoboost, they clearly have plans to remove it. Its a lot of wasted money sinking cash into 3 engines on top of special moniker vehicle's like a gt500 etc, every time a new chassis roles out. It most definitely was a waste of cash back to the time you're reffering to as well. A specialized engine makes sense for special badged vehicles with history thats it. For the sake of economy is backwards, sink more money into that second engine and find more mpg.
My stance is based on over 3 decades in the industry.
Due to this transitional period, I think we're going to see a lot of vehicles offered with both ICE and electric or hybrid powertrains over the next 5-10 years. It is what it is. And Ford can probably afford to offer these varied options on the Mustang since they sell so many.
Sponsored