• Welcome to Mustang7G!

    If you're joining us from Mustang6G, then you may already have an account here!

    As long as you were registered on Mustang6G as of March 10, 2021 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password!

The new dashboard is a big mistake IMO

Bikeman315

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Threads
33
Messages
6,044
Reaction score
1,460
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT/CS
Only refering to dash design. My experience on the M6G is that most weren’t overly excited. Dunno about outside media.
Take anything you’re reading on an enthusiasts Internet forum with a grain of salt. There what, a few hundred members posting. Hardly a realistic sampling. Although “some” of us are extremely knowledgeable. :crackup: :cwl: :like:
Sponsored

 

DRB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
349
Reaction score
181
Location
Silver Spring
Vehicle(s)
2020 5.0 Performance Pack convertible, Rapid Red
Everything you just said is nonsense and has zero to do with my previous opinion.
Repeating yourself doesn't change the fact that you're mistaken.

We'll see what we'll see.
 

RTFM

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
77
Reaction score
85
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicle(s)
Mach1 2022 MT
It's a sad day in history when you cannot tell a Mustang dash from that of a Chevy Silverado anymore.

58iyr1obe9w0.jpg
Me! Me! Meeee! I can tell it.
This picture can not be from a new Ford Mustang dashboard because it has actual physical buttons for the AC and seat climatisation.
 

CANTWN4LSN

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
603
Reaction score
4
Location
northwest
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350
Actually have a 2021 3500HD Silverado and it has an aesthetically pleasing integrated and very functional dash that I wish they had copied for the Mustang rather than the stuck on tablet look.
 

Tonystark

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
155
Reaction score
143
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang 4-Turbo w/Pony package
Repeating yourself doesn't change the fact that you're mistaken.

We'll see what we'll see.
Not repeating ... clarifying an opinion.
 


Strokerswild

Shallow and Pedantic
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
2,909
Reaction score
168
Location
Southern MN
Vehicle(s)
Stuff With Wheels
Me! Me! Meeee! I can tell it.
This picture can not be from a new Ford Mustang dashboard because it has actual physical buttons for the AC and seat climatisation.
As it should.....you know, so you don't have to take your eyes off the road.
 

DRB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
349
Reaction score
181
Location
Silver Spring
Vehicle(s)
2020 5.0 Performance Pack convertible, Rapid Red
Back at the turn of the century, I was working but flat broke, and I needed a car. I leased the cheapest new car you could get at the time, and bought it outright a year or two later as my situation slowly improved.

That cheap car was everything I could have asked. I put three hundred thousand miles on it, it got 42 miles mpg highway, I had to replace the clutch once and that was it. Okay, interior trim fell off all the time. C'est la guerre.

Ten years later, I bought a Mustang.

The cheap car had manual windows, at a time when most cars already had power. But, you know, cheap car.

A few years from now, that's the kind of car where you'll find analog instrument clusters. Not a thing wrong with 'em.
 
Last edited:

ay1820

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
79
Reaction score
104
Location
Connecticut
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT/CS
A few years from now, that's the kind of car where you'll find analog instrument clusters. Not a thing wrong with 'em.
Actually, analog clusters and physical buttons are more expensive to manufacture. Integrating everything into a single touchscreen saves a lot of money.

Like most new tech, digital dashboards are showing up in premium models first since the R&D costs are high, but I suspect that you will see lower end cars moving to all digital with a low cost do-all "screen" once that initial R&D expense has been covered.

I also suspect that higher end cars will end up moving back to more ergonomically pleasing controls and gauges in the not too distant future. Digital screens will still be a part of the premium dash, but only where it provides true advantage.
 

DRB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
349
Reaction score
181
Location
Silver Spring
Vehicle(s)
2020 5.0 Performance Pack convertible, Rapid Red
Actually, analog clusters and physical buttons are more expensive to manufacture. Integrating everything into a single touchscreen saves a lot of money.

Like most new tech, digital dashboards are showing up in premium models first since the R&D costs are high, but I suspect that you will see lower end cars moving to all digital with a low cost do-all "screen" once that initial R&D expense has been covered.

I also suspect that higher end cars will end up moving back to more ergonomically pleasing controls and gauges in the not too distant future. Digital screens will still be a part of the premium dash, but only where it provides true advantage.
Yeah, you're absolutely right. I should have said that digital will predominate in mass-production automobiles. Very high-end luxury vehicles and some supercars will feature elaborately designed and detailed analog gauges, I'm sure, Just Because.

The expense of manufacture and assembly was supposedly responsible for the wide discontinuance of old-style manual features like window levers, just as you point out in regard to instrument clusters. Power windows were once an option, a little upgrade over manual. But as the cost of sealed, plug-in units came down, the lesser expense of manufacturing the manual units was completely offset by the simplicity of a single assembly-line process for all cars rather than switching back and forth.
 

bloominguez

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
52
Reaction score
42
Location
Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
'22 Bronco, '22 5BW, '95 Integra, '94 VFR, '04 SV
The expense of manufacture and assembly was supposedly responsible for the wide discontinuance of old-style manual features like window levers, just as you point out in regard to instrument clusters. Power windows were once an option, a little upgrade over manual. But as the cost of sealed, plug-in units came down, the lesser expense of manufacturing the manual units was completely offset by the simplicity of a single assembly-line process for all cars rather than switching back and forth.
Sadly, the same is true of manual transmissions. :(
 

br_an

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
87
Reaction score
65
Location
NW USA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Mustang GT, 2020 Ford F150
Your hate for this car is flat out depressing. You can dislike something with out the vitriol. Yeah, I know its a Dutch thing. One of my best friends tends to do the same thing. :crackup: :cwl:

He's gonna eat those words, and look foolish when he does it.
 

analogman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
106
Reaction score
75
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Actually, analog clusters and physical buttons are more expensive to manufacture. Integrating everything into a single touchscreen saves a lot of money.

Like most new tech, digital dashboards are showing up in premium models first since the R&D costs are high, but I suspect that you will see lower end cars moving to all digital with a low cost do-all "screen" once that initial R&D expense has been covered.

I also suspect that higher end cars will end up moving back to more ergonomically pleasing controls and gauges in the not too distant future. Digital screens will still be a part of the premium dash, but only where it provides true advantage.
Bingo. It's all about the money. The reason for the digital dash is the same as why most companies do anything: it's cheaper, and to make more money.

To plagiarize myself from another thread (one of several on this topic) -

Several studies have shown that digital dashes in cars are more difficult to use, take more time than analog knobs and buttons, and are disliked by consumers:

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/0...y-are-worse-than-buttons-in-cars-study-finds/

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/23/opinion/touch-screens-cars.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/22/why-some-people-hate-touch-screens-in-cars.html

It's not rocket science. It takes longer and is more difficult to take your eyes off the road and peck at a screen to make something happen in a car, compared with being able to operate physical knobs and buttons by feel. In a smart phone a digital screen is progress, and likewise for a GPS mapping display. But for other operations it's less intuitive, and less safe. Traveling down the highway at 90 ft/sec, taking your eyes off the road for even a couple of seconds, a lot of distance is covered (a football field every 3 seconds) and a lot can happen in that time - like hitting something.

Even Jony Ive, the former Apple design chief responsible for the iPhone, iMac, iPad, and iPod, thinks more physical buttons should return to cars:

https://www.drive.com.au/news/former-apple-design-boss-physical-buttons-return-to-car-interiors/

There is only one reason the car companies are moving to screen interfaces: it's cheaper than physical knobs and buttons. It costs less to hot-glue a screen to the dash and program all the controls into software than to actually manufacture knobs and switches. My highest priority in buying a car is for a fun and safe driving experience, not to maximize the company's profits. If digital interfaces weren't cheaper, the companies wouldn't be putting them in. They're not doing it because it makes driving better, but to make more money for themselves. Plain and simple.

Ford can spin the marketing BS about the 'bold new immersive digital cockpit experience', but that's only because it sounds slicker than the truth - 'it's cheaper than knobs and buttons and we're all about the bottom line.'
 
 




Top