- Joined
- Jul 4, 2014
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 3,156
- Reaction score
- 912
- Location
- Irvine, ca
- Vehicle(s)
- 2003 cobra
- Banned
- #16
some people don’t understand physics.You're asking for a bundle of contradictions. If you make a naturally-aspirated V8 with tiny cylinders, you're losing more of your energy to cooling and it's inherently less efficient due to the way the flame front propagates versus an undersquare engine. You have to rev to get the horsepower, and you won't have low-end torque as you have neither displacement nor boost.
I'd argue for focusing on making the V8 the enthusiast engine, make the manual as crispy as you can deliver it, and let it be the car for the people who want smiles-per-gallon.
At certain displacement rates, a 4 cylinder engine is more powerful and efficient than an 8. A little bigger and 6 is the magic number. A bit more and 8 does the job best. It’s all about maximum total combustion without burning the house down.
Ford once offered a small 3.4 Yamaha v8 engine for the Taurus SHO. it sucked. They replaced it in a year with a 6. There is a reason v8 engines are usually at the very least 4.0 liters. And those usually have some FI help. Around 5 liters and larger, you get the big boy gains.
Sponsored