lcbrownz
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #31
I don't care about a theoretical pigskin conversation. This is a mustang forum so I addressed the mustang part of your post.
At least modern cars are safer to drive...![]()
If you drew a rough sketch on a napkin of one of those cars, then ask someone to identify it, 3 of out of 5 would have to guess what it was you were drawing.Ah yes, both cars have wheels, very derivative. In all seriousness, the two cars look nothing alike. The front and rear graphics, the proportions, the rooflines, all of those elements are drastically different. The challenger and Camaro both have squared off, notchback style rooflines. Where are all the comparisons there? Not only do they look similar, extra criticism could be directed towards them because notchbacks look like shit compared to fastbacks.
The only element that's anything like the Camaro is a flared out rear haunch. But that's a muscle car styling trait that goes back to the original mustang/Camaro. If the s650 is a modern interpretation of the first gen mustang, and the current Camaro is a modern take on the first gen Camaro, then doesn't the Camaro look like a mustang? Why are we saying the original ripped off the copycat? That's not how it works guys.
Sponsored