Sponsored
Status
Not open for further replies.

Junkyard Dog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2025
Threads
54
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
2,068
Location
Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2024 Dark Horse
Well, … I can already see ripping the 2.65 off for a whipple 3.8 and ID1300s…. This car should at least make 1200 in its sleep on E85 for owners that wanna spice 1 up.

I bet it’s tuneable out the gate or close to that.
You could likely have a ZR1 killer for well under the price of a ZR1
Which would probably ruin its ability to complete 6 hard laps . . .
Sponsored

 

Q6543

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
2,860
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
1993 fox
Owner dependent… people in my area mostly care about drag and roll, even ones that own car condos on a road course.
Just different flavors
 

DeluxeStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
1,741
Reaction score
2,305
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
Explorer
Good point! The car itself is super impressive from what we can tell, I just went on a rage over the name :crackup: .
I see both sides of this, the people who want the Shelby naming, but also why Ford wants to move past that naming convention. The mustang name will always be relevant and iconic, but the Shelby name? That's debatable. I don't deny it has tremendous historical value, and matters to older consumers.

But the people who grew up in the 60s who have that really strong connection to the Shelby name are getting to the point where they aren't buying cars anymore, let alone a 900 hp muscle car. I see why Fords trying to bring in a series of new icons instead of holding onto the past.

You don't want the mustang to become a Harley Davidson situation. A company that only tried to appeal to one group, and do one thing, and as a result, doesn't have a future. Mustang needs to adopt and evolve to remain relevant, preferably while retaining what made it iconic.
 

armyGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2017
Threads
13
Messages
219
Reaction score
383
Location
Butler, PA
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang GT
Wow!! I could spend big dollars on this car and then have someone ask me at a car cruise if this is a Special Edition ECO BOOST S650. There was no doubt that a Shelby was a Shelby and didn't look like a base GT package or added bling from American Muscle.
One man's trash is another man's treasure!
Go for it!
 

MaddNomad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
508
Reaction score
468
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
GRC
I see both sides of this, the people who want the Shelby naming, but also why Ford wants to move past that naming convention. The mustang name will always be relevant and iconic, but the Shelby name? That's debatable. I don't deny it has tremendous historical value, and matters to older consumers.

But the people who grew up in the 60s who have that really strong connection to the Shelby name are getting to the point where they aren't buying cars anymore, let alone a 900 hp muscle car. I see why Fords trying to bring in a series of new icons instead of holding onto the past.

You don't want the mustang to become a Harley Davidson situation. A company that only tried to appeal to one group, and do one thing, and as a result, doesn't have a future. Mustang needs to adopt and evolve to remain relevant, preferably while retaining what made it iconic.
Eh naw Shelby still is pretty synonymous with performance, but like I said earlier younger generations just don’t know the man as well.

New nameplates are good though, Mach 1 didn’t seem as special to me anymore. Bullitt as well.
 


broncoboy22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
573
Reaction score
601
Location
Laker Land
Vehicle(s)
‘22 Bronco Badlands, ‘02 F-150
Disappointed.

The car itself is an S650 GT500 as many have said.

But not my personal taste for looks and no manual option means not the one for me.

I’m hoping the S650 facelift looks good or that Ford still has some ultra secret Corbett fighting model to reveal. After seeing the RTR Bronco which is the “new Bronco model” this year’s NAIAS has been a let down for me
 

broncoboy22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
573
Reaction score
601
Location
Laker Land
Vehicle(s)
‘22 Bronco Badlands, ‘02 F-150
Why is Ford so enamored with RTR?

I have never seen an RTR Mustang on the street.
I have no idea. No disrespect to them but I have never liked their styling. Their hood vents on Mustangs look good and so does their project X light bar on the Bronco. But everything else is meh to me.

Back in the day you’d see Roush, Saleen Mustang variants pretty common. I’ve yet to see one RTR in the wild
 
Last edited:

topdawg4ever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
122
Reaction score
157
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
'25 Bronco Raptor, '25 Raptor 37, '24 Dark Horse 6sp Non HP (SOLD)
Anyone who thinks this is less than $100k is living in 2020. I’d be shocked if it’s not $105k plus.
 

Dragster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Threads
20
Messages
682
Reaction score
718
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
I see both sides of this, the people who want the Shelby naming, but also why Ford wants to move past that naming convention. The mustang name will always be relevant and iconic, but the Shelby name? That's debatable. I don't deny it has tremendous historical value, and matters to older consumers.

But the people who grew up in the 60s who have that really strong connection to the Shelby name are getting to the point where they aren't buying cars anymore, let alone a 900 hp muscle car. I see why Fords trying to bring in a series of new icons instead of holding onto the past.

You don't want the mustang to become a Harley Davidson situation. A company that only tried to appeal to one group, and do one thing, and as a result, doesn't have a future. Mustang needs to adopt and evolve to remain relevant, preferably while retaining what made it iconic.
I agree.

But Dark Horse SC is still a stupid name.
 

Dragster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Threads
20
Messages
682
Reaction score
718
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
Unless I read it wrong, the press release reads like only the track pack cars get the ducktail; so what does the base car get? A regular wing? A wing delete?
 

MustangMitch69

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2024
Threads
14
Messages
234
Reaction score
400
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang GT
Anyone who thinks this is less than $100k is living in 2020. I’d be shocked if it’s not $105k plus.
If that's the case I have no idea who they think their target buyer is for this. They've already claimed track focus, and for that kind of money OR LESS you can get any of these "sub supercar" track stars:

-C8 with the Z51package (because the Z06 is now $120K+)
-M4 Competition (grip battle)
-718 GTS 4.0 (brain matchup)
-CT5-V Blackwing (brawn matchup)
-Lotus Emira (only a V6 but light and hella fun on a track)

Simply put, at that price point it faces fierce competition from mid-engine and precision-engineered rivals that prioritize different ways of achieving lap times.
 

5.4dreams

Active Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Threads
1
Messages
40
Reaction score
13
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
11 gt500
If that's the case I have no idea who they think their target buyer is for this. They've already claimed track focus, and for that kind of money OR LESS you can get any of these "sub supercar" track stars:

-C8 with the Z51package (because the Z06 is now $120K+)
-M4 Competition (grip battle)
-718 GTS 4.0 (brain matchup)
-CT5-V Blackwing (brawn matchup)
-Lotus Emira (only a V6 but light and hella fun on a track)

Simply put, at that price point it faces fierce competition from mid-engine and precision-engineered rivals that prioritize different ways of achieving lap times.
This is my thought. Just looked up new z06 with z07 and they can be had for 130k new. If DH SC track pack is the same price is going to be not so good.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top