Sponsored

Remote Shutdown Mandate [LOCKED DUE TO POLITICS]

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
Alan Applegate

Alan Applegate

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2024
Threads
37
Messages
1,014
Reaction score
967
Location
Roswell, NM
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang Eco-Boost Premium
Okay, so what if you're driving someone home because they're drunk, and the system thinks it is you the driver? Considering how many people are presently getting arrested for impaired driving, even though all of the chemical tests show you're cold-stone-sober!

May be we should change the mascot from Uncle Sam, to George Orwell?
 

Gregs24

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Threads
10
Messages
2,713
Reaction score
1,498
Location
Wiltshire UK & Charente FR
Vehicle(s)
Mustang V8 GT, Ford Kuga PHEV
Okay, so what if you're driving someone home because they're drunk, and the system thinks it is you the driver? Considering how many people are presently getting arrested for impaired driving, even though all of the chemical tests show you're cold-stone-sober!

May be we should change the mascot from Uncle Sam, to George Orwell?
Maybe they are just crap at driving then?
 

roket

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Threads
77
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
4,053
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
roketgamer.dev
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse
Okay, so what if you're driving someone home because they're drunk, and the system thinks it is you the driver? Considering how many people are presently getting arrested for impaired driving, even though all of the chemical tests show you're cold-stone-sober!

May be we should change the mascot from Uncle Sam, to George Orwell?
this is probably the main reason why the NHTSA is having a hard time with this. false positives will do so much harm, more so than the good. it will also boost the inevitable cause to defeat and disable these devices. just look at auto start stop. of course, nobody involved in the actual bill has any real idea of how all this would work, and they don't care. it just makes them look good for supporting it
 


Zig

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2023
Threads
36
Messages
4,611
Reaction score
2,493
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
‘24 F350 cclb drw fx4 6.7ho, ‘24 gt pp, ‘05 c6 f55, ‘01 fatboy, ‘03 sprtstr
this is probably the main reason why the NHTSA is having a hard time with this. false positives will do so much harm, more so than the good. it will also boost the inevitable cause to defeat and disable these devices. just look at auto start stop. of course, nobody involved in the actual bill has any real idea of how all this would work, and they don't care. it just makes them look good for supporting it
Autonomous driving alleviates the need
 

Jimbo33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2025
Threads
7
Messages
47
Reaction score
73
Location
Rochester
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang GT conv
The car automatically reports you driving habits to your insurance companies. Where you drive and how you drive are continuously being monitored. I don't like it and a kill switch is too much. I recently had a wife of a cop say if you aren't doing anything wrong why do you care if you have no privacy. I immediately shot back when you go to the bathroom do you shut the door? Take a shower? Why, you are not doing anything wrong. I got no answer. Privacy is important and I don't like it that my car reports on me.
 

GeekGT5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
124
Reaction score
244
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang GT 5.0 Premium 10spd 3.55 gear
Erm, 'God' means nothing to a lot of people so has no impact on rights at all.
That's fine if they believe in God or not. The point is, the declaration of independence
, the constitution, etc point to a HIGHER authority than the government they were setting up as the SOURCE of the rights. " endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights "

It matters not if you believe in this God or not, only that the government does not have authority over the rights was the whole point of it!


This is why the bill of rights, do not GRANT a right, they are all limits on what the government can do to the people. They are not pointed at people, like 2A isn't limiting what the people can do, but what the government can do.
 

Zig

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2023
Threads
36
Messages
4,611
Reaction score
2,493
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
‘24 F350 cclb drw fx4 6.7ho, ‘24 gt pp, ‘05 c6 f55, ‘01 fatboy, ‘03 sprtstr
The car automatically reports you driving habits to your insurance companies. Where you drive and how you drive are continuously being monitored. I don't like it and a kill switch is too much. I recently had a wife of a cop say if you aren't doing anything wrong why do you care if you have no privacy. I immediately shot back when you go to the bathroom do you shut the door? Take a shower? Why, you are not doing anything wrong. I got no answer. Privacy is important and I don't like it that my car reports on me.
In this case they ‘assume’ the identity of the individual, insurance is the liability leverage (as in it ain’t covered if it ain’t you or a duly recognized authorized individual). In the kill switch scenario you are guilty until proven innocent (even though already ‘licensed’ - for whatever acknowledgment that means) and in the ‘convicted violator’ scenario the equipment and management thereof is an additional punishment burden, although just as ‘user agreements’ hold the weight if law so does acknowledgment of requirements by the request of license.
 

Gregs24

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Threads
10
Messages
2,713
Reaction score
1,498
Location
Wiltshire UK & Charente FR
Vehicle(s)
Mustang V8 GT, Ford Kuga PHEV
That's fine if they believe in God or not. The point is, the declaration of independence
, the constitution, etc point to a HIGHER authority than the government they were setting up as the SOURCE of the rights. " endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights "

It matters not if you believe in this God or not, only that the government does not have authority over the rights was the whole point of it!


This is why the bill of rights, do not GRANT a right, they are all limits on what the government can do to the people. They are not pointed at people, like 2A isn't limiting what the people can do, but what the government can do.
So what is that higher authority?

Where does that authority lie today?

I can understand the idea that God was that higher authority back then but we all know that the position of religions has changed considerably since the 1700's This seems to me to be one of the problems when things like the constitution, Bill of Rights etc are so old and were never written with modern day life in mind - they simply couldn't be.
 

Zig

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2023
Threads
36
Messages
4,611
Reaction score
2,493
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
‘24 F350 cclb drw fx4 6.7ho, ‘24 gt pp, ‘05 c6 f55, ‘01 fatboy, ‘03 sprtstr
So what is that higher authority?

Where does that authority lie today?

I can understand the idea that God was that higher authority back then but we all know that the position of religions has changed considerably since the 1700's This seems to me to be one of the problems when things like the constitution, Bill of Rights etc are so old and were never written with modern day life in mind - they simply couldn't be.
How can one reply without wading into forbidden waters? Maybe a good analogy but talk about being put on the spot ….
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top