Sponsored

Handling Pack-Mistake

Ryunker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Threads
21
Messages
589
Reaction score
728
Location
Madison South Dakota
Vehicle(s)
2013 convertible, 1971 Mach1, 2024 DH 700A
I have a 700a car, without HP and it is absolutely perfect. After getting it, and now with some miles on it, if had to do it buy again HP or non HP, would avoid HP hands down. Car is perfect as is. Can not see why anyone would order the HP (with the exception of routine track days).
Sponsored

 

raceheart77

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
38
Reaction score
52
Location
New Jesery
Vehicle(s)
Too many
I would get the HP springs from Ford. The DH HP stance is perfect. Hearing about clicking and noises from aftermarket springs would make me worried.
The non-HP stance looks goofy to me, big wheel gap... sits like a commuter car for a "track weapon".
 

Mikepol2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Threads
4
Messages
352
Reaction score
98
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1, 2019 Ram
Can’t be, otherwise the wheel well gap would be horrific.
Non-HP front tires are 255/40-19, diameter is 27.03", radius 13.52".
HP front 305/30-19, diameter 26.20", radius 13.10".
So the HP front has 0.40" less ground clearance because of the tires but has a 0.40" larger wheel gap to the fender, some of which is masked by the fender lips.

Non-HP rear 275/40-19, diameter 27.66", radius 13.83".
HP rear 315/30-19, diameter 26.44", radius 13.22".
So the HP rear has 0.61" less ground clearance than the non-HP but has a 0.61" larger fender gap.
 
OP
OP
topdawg4ever

topdawg4ever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
122
Reaction score
157
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
'25 Bronco Raptor, '25 Raptor 37, '24 Dark Horse 6sp Non HP (SOLD)
So your telling me aside from wheel gap, the HP vs non HP are the same in stance before you account for wheels.
Non-HP front tires are 255/40-19, diameter is 27.03", radius 13.52".
HP front 305/30-19, diameter 26.20", radius 13.10".
So the HP front has 0.40" less ground clearance because of the tires but has a 0.40" larger wheel gap to the fender, some of which is masked by the fender lips.

Non-HP rear 275/40-19, diameter 27.66", radius 13.83".
HP rear 315/30-19, diameter 26.44", radius 13.22".
So the HP rear has 0.61" less ground clearance than the non-HP but has a 0.61" larger fender gap.
 


roadpilot

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2024
Threads
9
Messages
3,260
Reaction score
3,697
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
21 F150 Platinum, 16 ATS4, 14 LTZ
I doubt that it's the same spring for HP and non-HP; HP requires a certain rigidity.
Anybody having access to parts catalog for the cars can look up the part numbers and avoid doubting or guessing. Any takers?
 

Mikepol2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Threads
4
Messages
352
Reaction score
98
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1, 2019 Ram
So your telling me aside from wheel gap, the HP vs non HP are the same in stance before you account for wheels.
I doubt that it's the same spring for HP and non-HP; HP requires a certain rigidity.
Anybody having access to parts catalog for the cars can look up the part numbers and avoid doubting or guessing. Any takers?
100% Correct. I will try to find the link of the Ford Engineer where he mentions the the different springs and lowered ride height of the DH HP.
Although I have not seen this confirmed, it would seem reasonable that the DH springs and sway bars are the same as the Mach 1. Here is a chart I put together with spring rates and sway bar sizes for various models. I currently am running the stock Mach 1 HP springs with the Steeda adjustable sway bar.

PP1 w/o MRMach 1Mach 1 HP / PP2GT350 (2016-2018)GT350 (2019+)GT350RSteeda Dual-RateSteeda 555-1017
Front springs165 lb194 lb211 lb194 lb211 lb240 lb195 / 300
Rear springs728 lb657 lb742 lb914 lb857 lb914 lb800 / 1300
Front sway32.0mm solid33.3 x 5.0mm wall (JR3C 5482 DA)33.3 x 5.0mm wall (JR3C 5482 DA)34 x 5.7mm wall34 x 4.8mm wall35 mm (5% thicker)
Rear sway22.2mm solid24 x 3.6mm wall24mm solid (JR3C 5A772 DA)24 x 3.6mm wall24 x 3.6mm wall25.4 mm (6% thicker)
 
OP
OP
topdawg4ever

topdawg4ever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
122
Reaction score
157
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
'25 Bronco Raptor, '25 Raptor 37, '24 Dark Horse 6sp Non HP (SOLD)
I’m assuming the downside to lowering the car, is ride quality on longer road trips. Having logged enough miles in a GT500 track pack, that certainly isn’t a road trip car.
 

Upacurb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2022
Threads
20
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
2,220
Location
Up a curb at cars and coffee
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT350R 2022 F250 PowerStroke 2020 Explorer
I’m assuming the downside to lowering the car, is ride quality on longer road trips. Having logged enough miles in a GT500 track pack, that certainly isn’t a road trip car.
I do road trips in mine all the time… cup 2 and carbon fiber wheels and all … just recently did a 1000 mile trip to Scottsdale and back for Barrett Jackson and some cars and coffees
IMG_2075.webp
 
OP
OP
topdawg4ever

topdawg4ever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
122
Reaction score
157
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
'25 Bronco Raptor, '25 Raptor 37, '24 Dark Horse 6sp Non HP (SOLD)
I'm not sayng you can't road trip. I am saying there is a trade off. Has to be a less comfortable ride. Always a great time regardless, but my old bones, and long torso need some comfort at this stage.
I do road trips in mine all the time… cup 2 and carbon fiber wheels and all … just recently did a 1000 mile trip to Scottsdale and back for Barrett Jackson and some cars and coffees
 

Upacurb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2022
Threads
20
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
2,220
Location
Up a curb at cars and coffee
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT350R 2022 F250 PowerStroke 2020 Explorer
I'm not sayng you can't road trip. I am saying there is a trade off. Has to be a less comfortable ride. Always a great time regardless, but my old bones, and long torso need some comfort at this stage.
LOL I'm almost 50 - Ill be there soon as well!
 

Cody5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Threads
10
Messages
66
Reaction score
36
Location
Nebraska
Vehicle(s)
2024 Dark Horse Handling Package 2026 Explorer Tremor
Can’t be, otherwise the wheel well gap would be horrific.
The springs are responsible for ~.25” of ride height difference. And this is comparing my PP1 to my PP2 with the PP2 sitting even lower as the 305/30R19 on the rear is stretched.
 

Polo08816

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
154
Reaction score
116
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2014 BMW 335i
I’m assuming the downside to lowering the car, is ride quality on longer road trips. Having logged enough miles in a GT500 track pack, that certainly isn’t a road trip car.
I do road trips in mine all the time… cup 2 and carbon fiber wheels and all … just recently did a 1000 mile trip to Scottsdale and back for Barrett Jackson and some cars and coffees
IMG_2075.jpeg
While stiffer springs and/or slightly lower ride height (and thus suspension travel) can negatively impact ride quality, I'm of the opinion that tire sidewall height and stiffness have a greater effect on ride quality.
 

tj@steeda

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Threads
122
Messages
2,462
Reaction score
846
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2015 Steeda Mustang
We have a Dark Horse on order & it should be delivered soon & we also have had several we have upgraded since the release - if you want any feedback, I can put you in contact with Rodney &/or John - they are two (2) of our lead sales professionals with a strong background in suspension set-ups.

Let me know - you can connect with me at [email protected] & I can make an intro.

Best,

TJ
Sponsored

 
 








Top