because_murica
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2021
- Threads
- 31
- Messages
- 958
- Reaction score
- 1,371
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- 2013 Camaro SS-1LE
- Thread starter
- #1
Sponsored
Absolutely agree. I think that has alot to do with the fact that the dual screens appear to have reduced bezels.Not gonna lie, the dual screen setup is pretty nice, nicer than the unified setup in my opinion.
The bezels are way better and even make the black levels acceptable. The mega chonk bezel surrounding the āpremiumā single-pane setup makes the screens stand out in such a jarring way that youād need OLED-equivalent black levels to blend the borders and hide the fact that you have two small rectangles sitting in a giant plastic case.Absolutely agree. I think that has alot to do with the fact that the dual screens appear to have reduced bezels.
Iām just not seeing this huge bezel youāre talking about. From every image I can find the overall perimeter dimensions of the different setups are the same with no additional bezel on the top or outsides and the only different is the connection in the middle.The bezels are way better and even make the black levels acceptable. The mega chonk bezel surrounding the āpremiumā single-pane setup makes the screens stand out in such a jarring way that youād need OLED-equivalent black levels to blend the borders and hide the fact that you have two small rectangles sitting in a giant plastic case.
The single screen is a good concept, but itās a weak physical execution versus the current/near-future offerings from other brands.
Also, the dual screen setup at least lines up from edge to edge at the top. I donāt know why it bothers me so much that they have asymmetrically sized screens in the conjoined setup; wouldāve even preferred that they trimmed the top of the main screen down a little to be in line with the gauge screen, then trim the bezel to match. Would also open up line of sight.
Because the āgauge clusterā is a smaller unit and the entire pane is leveled to the much larger and taller infotainment screen, it sits in a sea of black plastic.Iām just not seeing this huge bezel youāre talking about. From every image I can find the overall perimeter dimensions of the different setups are the same with no additional bezel on the top or outsides and the only different is the connection in the middle.
I donāt believe you are correct that the gauge cluster screen is small in one car vs the other, we just havenāt been given a good enough look at the dual screen set up to compare side-by-side. It would cost Ford more money to have two different display sizes produced for the car.Because the āgauge clusterā is a smaller unit and the entire pane is leveled to the much larger and taller infotainment screen, it sits in a sea of black plastic.
The only realistic fixes are to either 1) increase the gauge screen height, which might be pointless due to visual obstruction of the wheel itself, 2) reduce the height of the infotainment screen and bring the entire pane down, 3) contour the pane so that it steps down to match the reduced screen heightāwhich would look weird fwiw, 4) improve black levels and have a soft fade around the screen borders so it isnāt so obvious in personāwhich it isāthat thereās 3-4ā of plastic between both screens and a ton of extra bezel space surrounding the gauge pod.
For all I know the gauge clusters could be the same size, but the base setup isnāt sitting in a bezel thatās too big for it which is kind of the benefit of having its own bezel fit to sizeI donāt believe you are correct that the gauge cluster screen is small in one car vs the other, we just havenāt been given a good enough look at the dual screen set up to compare side-by-side. It would cost Ford more money to have two different display sizes produced for the car.
I get what you're saying but my point was that I don't believe the bezel between the two models is any different on the top and sides, they used the same vertical dimensions between the two setups and created a bezel that just connects the two displays, so the only extra black around the screen is in the center. Again, we won't know for sure until we are able to sit in the two side-by-side.For all I know the gauge clusters could be the same size, but the base setup isnāt sitting in a bezel thatās too big for it which is kind of the benefit of having its own bezel fit to size
That 3-4 in bezel is still there, as you can see, and the infotainment screen is level with the guage cluster still too.Because the āgauge clusterā is a smaller unit and the entire pane is leveled to the much larger and taller infotainment screen, it sits in a sea of black plastic.
The only realistic fixes are to either 1) increase the gauge screen height, which might be pointless due to visual obstruction of the wheel itself, 2) reduce the height of the infotainment screen and bring the entire pane down, 3) contour the pane so that it steps down to match the reduced screen heightāwhich would look weird fwiw, 4) improve black levels and have a soft fade around the screen borders so it isnāt so obvious in personāwhich it isāthat thereās 3-4ā of plastic between both screens and a ton of extra bezel space surrounding the gauge pod.
I understand itās a lot of griping, but if they want to appeal to the tech crowd, they should understand that weāre used to modern phones, tablets, and monitors, not iPhone 3Gs and their associated bezels.
You might be right, would be very weird for the only difference to be literally just a physical enclosure and not any change in actual screen size or resolution thoughI get what you're saying but my point was that I don't believe the bezel between the two models is any different on the top and sides, they used the same vertical dimensions between the two setups and created a bezel that just connects the two displays, so the only extra black around the screen is in the center. Again, we won't know for sure until we are able to sit in the two side-by-side.