1320'
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2014
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 64
- Location
- Medford,Oregon
- Vehicle(s)
- 2011 Avenger...sadly
Apparently this decision was made in June, before the Camaro arrived.
Sponsored
Porsche, BMW. I am sure Ford still pays attention to the Camaro but back in 2014 there were tons of posts here about Ford's intended targets and why all explained by Dave P. and others within the Mustang group.Then competition from whom? Or do you think competition had nothing to do with this change?
One of the cars Ford stated as a benchmark for the S550 is the same car the Camaro just handed its ass to, the M4. I don't think it is completely out of the realm of possibility to assume Ford is watching GM do a better job at achieving Ford's goals against cars like M4, than Ford is.
Reasons aside, I'll gladly welcome a completely new GT in 2020 when I'll be in the market for a new sports car.
What else should we expect from General Motors Trend?It's funny because back in October 2010 when they put the 2011 GT vs the M3 the GT lost at streets of willow by less than a tenth of a second to the M3 and motortrend said a win is a win and that the M3 won.
Fast forward to 2016 and the SS loses to the M4 by a larger margin than the GT did to the M3 and they shout from the rooftops how much better the SS is and how it beat the M4.
Now I'm not into conspiracy theory but that grinds my gears (just a little bit).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This. 3550 lb Mustang will be glorious.I'm really hoping this car will get the aluminum F150 treatment and the voodoo.
With all of the existing aluminum components already, I just do not see that much weight on the table. I am sure they can save some, but not 300 lbs without shrinking the size, and I think that would be a mistake sales wise.This. 3550 lb Mustang will be glorious.
Love the trunk space and that two people fit in the backseats for short distances. Shrinking the size would be the wrong way to save weigth imho. There are enough sports cars with way too limited space for a daily driver. Just take a look how much trunkspace was lost from 5th to 6th gen Camaro.With all of the existing aluminum components already, I just do not see that much weight on the table. I am sure they can save some, but not 300 lbs without shrinking the size, and I think that would be a mistake sales wise.
I don't think the usual V8 buyer cares that much about mileageStart saving for the greatest, hopefully they keep the V8 with better gas mileage!
Exactly! Saw a post on Camaro6 where a guy was talking about how he dispelled the myth that the trunk was small, he fit a set of golf clubs in his car by taking a number of them out and fitting them front to back with the back seats folded. I have put two sets in the trunk of my convertible with no problem and there is still extra room. That is my "can I live with this car" test, and my GT 'Vert passed it with flying colors. Also, my kids are quite comfortable with plenty of legroom in my normal driving position. No way I would have considered the Camaro.Love the trunk space and that two people fit in the backseats for short distances. Shrinking the size would be the wrong way to save weigth imho. There are enough sports cars with way too limited space for a daily driver. Just take a look how much trunkspace was lost from 5th to 6th gen Camaro.
I think they care about (especially when it's $3.00 again), I just don't think they stress about it as much as other types of car buyers do.I don't think the usual V8 buyer cares that much about mileage![]()
Come on Todd I love ya but your comment is ridiculous.Not competition from the Camaro. Ford has stated a ton who their competition is and what they used as cars for their S550 program.
You honestly believe that? Due to that MT comparison, Ford responds within a week and moves their program up by 2 years. Come on now.
I disagree.