Bear376
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2018
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 360
- Reaction score
- 208
- Location
- Stillwater, OK
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 GT (60th), 2019 EcoBoost , 2013 MCA SE, 2019 Flex, 2017 F150
Sorry, but car size has little to do with emission standards or fuel economy regulations. That is why everyone has gone to SUVs, is because they fall under truck standards which is less stringent. This might be part of the reason behind the Mustang Mach E is they found some way to offset the Coyote engine in the regs.
The Mustang has been able to maintain a weight of around 3000 lbs. until the SN95. Even so, it has been getting heavier every generation. Part of it is due to insurance/safety pressure. More rigid chassis and crash bracing, air bags, etc. The original Mustang were hardtops, which means no support for the roof at the rear of the door. To sate the safety gods, all cars now have pillars at the doors to add rollover protection. They install Coyote engines in SN95 Mustangs all the time, so the smaller size is not the issue. The 650 actually has a shorter wheelbase than the 65 Mustang. It is longer overall and taller and wider than the 65.
The Mustang has been able to maintain a weight of around 3000 lbs. until the SN95. Even so, it has been getting heavier every generation. Part of it is due to insurance/safety pressure. More rigid chassis and crash bracing, air bags, etc. The original Mustang were hardtops, which means no support for the roof at the rear of the door. To sate the safety gods, all cars now have pillars at the doors to add rollover protection. They install Coyote engines in SN95 Mustangs all the time, so the smaller size is not the issue. The 650 actually has a shorter wheelbase than the 65 Mustang. It is longer overall and taller and wider than the 65.
Sponsored