Can't answer this question. I just saw a Ford related video and posted it. I once ran a Tier 1 supplier to Ford and a lot of what is said in the video is true. Ford is ruthless to work with or for. Want to be a Ford engineer, one needs to be prepared to work 15 hour days 7 days a week. That's why we found them so easy to recruit. They all live for the retirement system. I interviewed with Ford right out of college and told the plant manager at the end of my interviews that I didn't want to work for Ford. That ended that as I wished.They made a bunch of money this quarter despite all the offshoring and penny pinching
why would they stop when the bean counters and MBAs run the show?
Wonder which uses more domestic parts ? Is it Qc or parts?Caught a Ford vs GM recall/quality segment on one of the business channels earlier this week. Ford sure didn't compare very well with GM last year and so far this year.
From a personal perspective; I'm not complaining. The only recall on my GT is the BCM, and I haven't had ANY problem with leakage on my GT.Hope that trend continues!
@Frogdog1 agrees 100% that the UAW is the root cause of MANY problems but as you say, that is another topic.6 years with Ford, total of 47 in the dealership service business including Cadillac and Lexus, and my main take away is the Ford cares noting about anything other than selling a car and seeing it go over the curb. The accountants dicate to the engineers, hampering what they can do. Example, the dry clutch trans issues af about 10 years ago. Internal memos from engineering said that this was a bad idea, a wet clutch system was needed, but it costs bit more than the dry system and so it was shot down. Other memos noted that the failures would be after the warranty ran out and accounting was ok with that. Several engineers quit over it. And all this contributed to Ford settling a $70M lawsuit over it. And I bet that Frogdog will agree that the UAW is a large part of the problem, hell that's another thread all its own. Someone here complained once about something, and I pointed out that these were mid priced domestic cars, built by union labor. They didn't like that very much, but its the truth.
They provide zero suport to the dealer body or the customer, and in every interaction with the customer, will make us look like the bad guy. Service managers have ZERO goodwill repair capability, hell even Jaguar left it to our discretion! They dictate how many rental cars we are allowed to have, of course we can BUY all we want from them at list price, which very few dealers can afford. They will tell us to get the customer a rental from Enterprise, then kick back the bill when we submit it, saying the repair didn't qualify. Their official stance is that Ford does not cover rentals, read your warranty book and see if they promise you anything, any where in there, they do not. In 2020, we ate almost $20K in unpaid rental bills before we were told to stop using outside sources. In short, every day with Ford is a struggle.
Well hell then, why do I stay, you might ask? I'm 4 years from retirement, I love the actual job itself, and the group that owns our dealer is great to work for. I make good money and am close to home, so I do the best I can every day for the customer, within the bounds of what I am able to.
If I were even 10 years younger, I'd be long gone from Ford, or transferred to our Cadillac store.
Oh, that's exactly what American car makers do is build and the problem cars go to a "hospital" area to get "fixed".I can add some context here..
recalls are literally part of the overall process at this point.
The mantra is keep lines running no matter what.. so understand that is THE CORE PRINCIPLE
Have a bad batch of components… keep the lines running, enter in the quality systems and repair offline later.
can’t figure out an issue…. Build build build until there is a solution
a lot of this came to light during Covid… vehicles were built without relays, chips, computers, steering wheels, seats,… hell WHEELS… they’d get built on temp spares
the accountants have calculated repairs after the fact are less expensive then slowing or stopping the line.
It's not always possible. My son-in-law used to work with recall programs at Toyota's US headquarters. They would sometimes discover they had received a defective batch of parts from a supplier, but the defects weren't visible at assembly. By the time the issue was known, vehicles had been sold by dealers and needed to be recalled. One interesting thing he mentioned is they would try to catch as many of the vehicles as possible before they reached the dealerships. It was cheaper to send people to fix them in railyards than paying the dealers to do it.Contrast that with Toyota and Kawasaki, (both have been customers of mine) and ANYONE working on an assembly line is EXPECTED to stop the line if there is a problem, EVERYBODY is expected to fix the problem then and there,