Although motortrend (yeah i know i know mag rag numbers) found the mn6 gt to be slightly quicker than the mn6 dh^^^^ This is why stock to stock, the DH is faster.
But when I do this to the GT, then its magic. MOMMY I MADE A DARK HORSE!@@
![]()
Nobody said they were H beams or anything like thatJust answering my own first question.
Apparently powdered sintered steel rods.
https://www.facebook.com/100000580527312/videos/pcb.25940896782179651/25029545536735144
And, a more important issue - very tight ring gaps, a concern for boost and heat
Sure. What you are seeing is desired engine tq by the PCM at the given engine speed v gear. And the lower numbers mean the PCM wants less tq (aka tq management) in the GT at similar engine speeds v gear than the DH. And by raising those values, Im allow the engine to make more indicated (calculated) tq than what the OEM has allowed. This is a big part of both the PCM and TCM, both side of which have tq management in place for various reasons. Be it emissions, driveline protection or in this case to create a delta between the GT and the DH. With all other factors equal, on paper the DH's straight line performance at least, looks to be a placebo. And in practice, it has proven to be as well.Could you explain post # 31 for those of us who have no idea what we are staring at, without all the snarky sarcasm? What is the chart? What does your highlighted 496 at 5th and 9,000 represent? What do all of the green, yellow, orange, and pink colors mean?
Thats "margin of error" stuff. With the stock tune, these cars are very effected by Engine coolant temp, trans temps, octane and a laundry list of other things. Many of which most tuners eliminate to create a much more consistent power delivery structure.Although motortrend (yeah i know i know mag rag numbers) found the mn6 gt to be slightly quicker than the mn6 dh
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/...boost-s650-0-60-mph-quarter-mile-acceleration
I wouldnāt even go that far, DH has big ass brakes and too many coolers weighing it down.^^^^ This is why stock to stock, the DH is faster
Is 418 at 4,900 rpm in fourth/fifth the stock value?You know they quote flywheel hp.
Here is the differences between a 2025 Auto DH and a 2025 GT PP.
Maximum Torque Lower Hysteresis Maximum Torque 1 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque OP 1 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque 2 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque OP 2 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque 3 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque OP 3 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque 4 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Maximum Torque OP 4 vs. Gear. vs. Engine Speed Master DTC List 4x4 Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS ABS Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Base Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cold Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 2 Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 3 Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS DSC Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Level 2 Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Snow Mode Upshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Traction Control Upshift Map OSS vs. Torque vs. RPM ABS Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Base Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cold Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 2 Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 3 Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS DSC Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Level 2 Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Snow Mode Downshift Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Trans Downshift Map OSS In Select Shift 4x4 Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS ABS Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Base Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cold Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 2 Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Cooling Reduction 3 Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS DSC Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Inferred Grade Level 2 Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Mud Mode Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Sand Mode Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Snow Mode Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS Sport Coastdown Map OSS vs. Shift vs. TPS TCC Lock 4x4 OSS vs. Gear vs. Pedal Position TCC Slip 4x4 OSS vs. Gear vs. Pedal Position Transmission Axle Torque Limit Active Exhaust Position Table 2 Active Exhaust Position Table 3 Active Exhaust Position Table 5 Active Exhaust Position Table 6 Active Exhaust Position Table 7
Those two screen shots minus the one with the pink numbers that I changed are all stock values for the GT and the DH. They are calculated tq values by the PCM and TCM. Not arbitrary but not what you are thinking with what Ford advertises or what a dyno would measure. These cars are all controlled by their calculated tq values. Which are the same GT and DH, just managed heavier on the GT as shown.Is 418 at 4,900 rpm in fourth the stock value?
Those are different looking rods than the ones the AED dark horse teardownAnd here is t
Yes, they did.
Forged parts alone don't make any more power than castTry again homes, i guess cams and rods donāt make any difference in your electronic book? Didnāt i say it seems weāre saying the gt is the better buy since the difference is driver dependent? You seem to be saying the only difference is at the top end (cough cough cam) where 90% of boy racers will never be able to spend much time at, unless on the closed roadcourse using a fuel specific tune?
They look the same to me. Predator, powdered. Can you assist me in differentiating between them?Those are different looking rods than the ones the AED dark horse teardown
TrueishForged parts alone don't make any more power than cast
Idk ford performance had a tent at Carlisle ford nationals this year and they told me to expect a tune by the end of the year, but that was also before it was unlocked by Hp tuners so not sure if that plan has changed for them. Especially since today is the end of the year and thereās still no FP tune lolSo far there is no FP tune for the GT... and word is there won't be?