Classic Lover
Well-Known Member
Surely you can see the problem with this logic, Lamborghini is a car brand not an individual car with a 55+ year history of being more or less true to its mission. The mustang has been a two door pony car from day one and you can’t just completely change what it is overnight and expect people to go along with it. If Lamborghini called their suv an Aventador or Huracan that would be comparable. But they didn’t, because they had respect for the names that have made their brand what it is today. That being said both the Urus and Ferrari Purosangue are cash grabs to sell the brand to people who will buy an suv but not a traditional Ferrari or Lamborghini, so in that sense you’re correct it is watering down the brand but certainly not in a comparable way to the mach e. Also the urus which is basically an Audi, has been extremely successful, Lamborghini has sold more urus suvs than all previous Lamborghini models combined. Everyone bows the knee to profits eventually I guess.Take a history lesson on the marketing of the mustang. It was originally marketed as a practical, fast fun, family vehicle. It's target market was even women. The Mach-E's performance is pretty great for what it is. Saying that the Mach-E is not a mustang is like saying the Urus is not a Lamborghini.
Sponsored