Trella
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2025
- Threads
- 20
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 109
- Location
- Rotonda Florida / From Chicago
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Mustang GT Premium RTR Spec 2 / 2018 Mustang GT Premium / 2018 F-150 Sport
Point taken. However, in my experience, when you really really really wanted to reach out and touch someone or needed stopping power in dense underbrush, the 14 was great. I'll admit that I'm a bit biased about the 14. The Corps only started issuing 16s when I was close to rotating home and I chose to keep my 14 until I left. I never had a problem with it because of its weight or length and if you were short on ammo, that wood-stock made a great club! Not trying to get in a debate about the pros and cons of the two weapons, just killin' time jawin' back and forth. Take Care Junkyard Dog!On a less joking note, that rifle is very hard to control on full auto. No, I am not old enough to have been issued one (M16A1, lol), but I have shot one, a transferable that I was considering purchasing in the 90s. It was very tough to keep the muzzle from climbing up and up.
It was really a bad idea for an assault rifle. .308 never was really designed for that role and was a bad attempt to copy what the Germans and then the Soviets had already done (e.g., the Soviets used their 7.62 battle rifle cartridge and designed a shorter, 39 mm case, but the US only dropped the 30-06 from the Garand battle rifle case length down to 51mm, making for a way too powerful rifle to use on full auto).
Like it or not, and it had teething pains, the 5.56 was a far better assault rifle cartridge, so much so that the Soviets later copied us and dropped the caliber of their AK-47 to 5.45, making an already controllable assault rifle even easier to use (the AK74).
OK, enough of this aside. Back to tripods and traffic disasters.
Sponsored
