because_murica
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2021
- Threads
- 31
- Messages
- 958
- Reaction score
- 1,367
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- 2013 Camaro SS-1LE
Found on IG. I believe the poster was godfather_media
Sponsored
If this is the extent of fitment issues on the S650 (and a year-early pre-production model no less) then hal-le-lu-jah!The fitment is on point as per Ford standard
I can tell you from experience, they’re maybe a tick better in terms of peak material quality but the main improvement is the consistency of material use across the boardI just want to see more high res pictures of the interior to get an idea of how materials and build quality are from that standpoint.
If you have car that is on a car show and has this alignment gap then you for sure cannot expect the production cars to be much betterIf this is the extent of fitment issues on the S650 (and a year-early pre-production model no less) then hal-le-lu-jah!
The S550’s build quality was equal to Frankenstein’s resurrection being finished on a Friday at 4:00pm. Hood seams, fender seams, trunk, rear bumper seams, window panels, you name it lol. Savagegeese did an excellent job of pointing this out to the public on his Bullitt review which made me happy because it never was talked about enough
After seeing tons of pics of the S650 and seeing it in person the build quality gap alone makes it look $5-10k more expensive lol
Definitely more tapered on the 650I am still so "obsessed" trying to figure out if the rear quarter windows are indeed exact carryover or are they shaped differently. Some claim it is exactly the same. But, I study photos and it looks like the bottom sweeps up more sharply.
Thank you! It is nice to know that I'm not the only one who sees it. And, to also know that Ford didn't just copy and past the DLO and roof completely for the "all new" S650 Mustang. I think that rear quarter window helps modernize the S650.Definitely more tapered on the 650