Search results

Going to look ridiculous and have terrible straight line traction as well Maybe he meant 295/30?

WRX doesn't have 6% drivetrain loss. It's way higher.

According to ford: 1. 87 octane is fine 2. you never need to change your tranny fluid 3. don't change the oil until the car tells you too even if it's 10,000 miles does any of this sound like a good idea?

It's funny how when the S650 came out they were making 430-440hp and were making so much power! Then tuning started and the baselines magically dropped to 400 or even less...

Livernois, Watson Racing, Walsh, Alternative Auto, is Pauls High Performance still around?, Vector, Boost Controlled

It's not the old 'bad' one, it's the same as the Edelbrock/VMP.

not a huge difference but enough to get a little increase for a few months. I think there's a good amount of people who were waiting for tuning to get an S650, they might still have to sell their S550. Also there's things like shops and aftermarket companies that are going to buy one for...

Increase in sales were people waiting for tuning.

Dealer here is just dumping those Mach E's for 0%, 72 months

Ford is making one of the only police vehicles already, the Explorer.

Why not? That's normally how it works.

The GM ones are even worse.

You just have to think about it in terms of horsepower gained per dollar...then it's double nuts!

Yup. Especially with these tiny turbocharged engines, CVTs, yearly oil changes, timing chain issues, crappy water pumps...

While adding even more weight, cost, complexity...

Only 10% of EcoBoost owners opted for the manual transmission. This compares to 27% of the V8 model.

The problem is the Charger is closer to a Crown Vic than a Mustang.

The only recent V8 sedan that sold well was the Charger. Look at the CTS-V, Pontiac G8, Chevrolet SS...

I don't think the sedan would outsell the coupe. It'd barely sell.