Search results

but Porsche did it, and Civic did it, so the unimaginative designers at Ford have to copy-cat. The 3 square element lights was done by BMW and Kia, so Mustang must copy-cat as well? How about an original thought?

as an avowed environmentalist, you could hold a gun to my head and I would still refuse to buy one.

which they should have supplied (actual steel) instead of pretending to.

and there is a VERY long thread on the subject on m6g

chassis/wheel dyno numbers are not relevant to crank HP claims. There's way to much fudging going on. Sure 430/.88 is 488 but unless you've got an actual engine dyno trace I don't believe a damn thing. And anyway 460, 480, or 500 it doesn't matter. Nobody sits down at the kitchen table and...

and expanding into a world-wide depression is going to means huge losses for all involved. S, Korea has chips overflowing their warehouses because lack of sales. If autos were smart they'd scoop up the glut of production in long term contracts. But it also assumes worldwide new car sales doesn't...

doubling the price didn't help any of that. So if maybe we triple the price?

watch them about-face in 2 seconds flat when nobody buys them. They'll throw the 5.7 v8 or a TT v6 in there so fast it'll make the EPA's heads spin. Yes EV are stupid fast. But people don't buy muscle cars because they are the fastest thing around. I would be utterly shocked if even 10% of...

I'll be surprised if ford does NOT put a long, thin light-bar across the front of the car. Like their design language has spoiled the F150 and Bronco.

but "brand design language..." *SMACK* Fk brand design language.

Taurus set the world on fire. Taurus EV or Taurus something would have been a perfect name for the Mach-E. The Maverick name could have been used too before they assigned it to what should have been called the Ranger. When the executive suggest dragging Mustang thru the mud the marketing...

except Ford would have to be incredibly stupid to put more air into the hood, they need to remove air.

I've never seen a dyno sheet that ever came close to being able to assert that. The nonsense of made up engine numbers stopped with the 70's.

I wonder why the 2-step in the horizontal middle. It's just needlessly 'busy'. Why project 2 inches of 'shelf' into every surface? Lop them all off so they fit flush or within 1/4" of the grill and headlight faces.

you're assuming model -> brand is a good thing. I obviously disagree. I think what happened was some shiester from Wall St. told the board, "we need you to extract 'value' from your nameplates. Your stock is shit, and going nowhere even compared to your peers." and marketing couldn't think of...

the Mach-E LOSES money. Even if it were making money not a DIME would go to buttress the Mustang. The ONLY thing that underwrites the very existence of the Mustang is the F150. F150 has the research budget. Tech is developed for the F150 and then the Mustang gets it. Mustang only exists out of...

yeah but over there they bask in the afterglow of the 50+year 'heritage' of the Mustang imparting gravitas to their soulless whine-mobile.

Never heard of DP so his statement has no value (to me). and No. All that is marketing-speak trying to convince you to swallow a bitter pill and whispering in your ear how sweet it is, and wouldn't you want another. The Mustang didn't need a stable-mate. this isn't the Kentucky Derby. It's been...

so? there hasn't been a lick of difference between EB/GT since S197 days. Has there EVER been a styling difference between the trims based on engine choice beyond the GT350/GT500 discrete models?

NASCAR have ZERO parts from any production car.