Search results

geez an "article" of outdated, pure speculation from half a year ago? I doubt the 3.5TT will be in the mustang. It would be nice but would require far more insight by the marketing department than they are capable of. I don't know what the differences are vis-a-vis the 2.7TT, 3.0TT and 3.5TT...

oops, I was looking at Explorer quarterly, not first half.

Explorer unit sales were less than Mustang, so with any luck by combining them, they both manage to survive. Personally I think the Explorer is dead man walking, and the Mustang will limp along as S550+one-off improvements here and there until Ford gets bought by VW. I would be happy if all Ford...

you should have a good chat with your federal gov't, specifically CONgress and the "Federal" Reserve bank. Because $34,000 in 1995 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $57,804.69 in 2020 due to currency debasement.

you confuse Ford with an organization that has money and is run by pursuit of excellence. Just look at the last 15 years of Mustang and ask yourself, when push come to shove did Ford design it RIGHT, or did they cheap-ass out and cut corners. CD6 is a big financial risk. I wouldn't be surprised...

He was referring to the MY2020 rollout I think. Also you want an example of bone-heads in engineering and accounting bodging stuff. The reason you see the exhaust tips on the Explorer turned 90deg down was because Ford's crappy cabin seals and aero conspired to draw exhaust into the cabin...

it's already too low and they want to compound the problem? The Camaro not selling and they want to copy it? chop 2" out of the slab side instead and raise the roof line an inch (or at least lengthen it further rearward).

likely because it was rush rush rush to get the 1st version out and then the engineers can step back and go fix all the crap they were not allowed to fix in the beginning. Happens every time in hardware and software when some executive declares a ship date will be honored no matter what - while...

2.7EB v6 replaces the 2.3EB 4 banger. A special EV package drives the front wheels for a cheap-man's partial 'quattro'. The Coyote3 continues unchanged. The above is pure speculation.

your premise is baseless. You're thinking AWD == 4WD driven off of the ICE+Trans. The front wheels (likely) run completely independent of the ICE+Trans and even of each other. Seems you missed the line at the hospital where they replaced the obsolete analog control circuitry with the digital...

That's how they got started. Every car was custom. It just so happened everyone wanted the same shade of black. Koons Sterling VA has one. It even has a manual transmission.

eek, have you driven one? The BRZ is tight. Gross number of interior cubic feet is a worthless metric. Hip room, shoulder room, elbow room, foot room, these are what matter. I'd have to go look up the numbers for the Gen7 GTI but you want to talk about spacious and lots of room to swing my arms...