Whipple and Resale Value

[Neggytive]

Warranty? Dealer will sell it as-is.

The rotor pack on a Whipple or TVS will last a looong time.

In some states dealers have to warranty their vehicles unless they are under a certain very low dollar threshold.

In MA it used to be anything under $700 could be sold without a warranty, anything over $699 with under 125000 mikes MUST have a warranty

Sponsored

 

[Jekyll_Hyde]

Does a whipple really destroy a Mustang over 5 - 10 years. I plan to keep my car for life and it’s new. If I add a whipper with the other recommended upgrades and drive mostly in a civilized way, will I regret it in the long term? I’m under the impression the car can handle the extra horse power and is built knowing drivers will likely modify the engine. Thoughts?

 

[robvas]

In some states dealers have to warranty their vehicles unless they are under a certain very low dollar threshold.

In MA it used to be anything under $700 could be sold without a warranty, anything over $699 with under 125000 mikes MUST have a warranty

That's terrible

 

[TonyT930]

Does a whipple really destroy a Mustang over 5 - 10 years. I plan to keep my car for life and it’s new. If I add a whipper with the other recommended upgrades and drive mostly in a civilized way, will I regret it in the long term? I’m under the impression the car can handle the extra horse power and is built knowing drivers will likely modify the engine. Thoughts?

To me, I can't see how a power adder like a Whipple wouldn't wear things out faster over time. Our Mustang GTs weren't designed for 700 hp and 600 lb ft of torque. Ok, maybe the engine can handle it to a certain degree, but the trans, rear axles, chassis, cats, wheel bearings, suspension etc not to mention heat management are potential problems. It might be fun and hold up for a while, but it sounds very very expensive for the ticket of admission and over time. And it's a ton of work if you are a DIYer. Do you have the time, patience, and money? Don't get me wrong, I have tossed around the idea of a supercharger for my car more than once. If I were to ever take the chance, it would be with a centrifugal supercharger, probably ESS. The centris seem to be easier on the other parts and heat management seems better.

 

[Jekyll_Hyde]

To me, I can't see how a power adder like a Whipple wouldn't wear things out faster over time. Our Mustang GTs weren't designed for 700 hp and 600 lb ft of torque. Ok, maybe the engine can handle it to a certain degree, but the trans, rear axles, chassis, cats, wheel bearings, suspension etc not to mention heat management.. It might be fun and hold up for a while, but it sounds very very expensive for the ticket of admission and over time. And it's a ton of work if you are a DIYer. Do you have the time, patience, and money? Don't get me wrong, I have tossed around the idea of a supercharger for my car more than once. If I were to ever take the chance, it would be with a centrifugal supercharger, probably ESS. The centris seem to be easier on the other parts and heat management seem better.

We’re all in different situations life-wise.

My first car was a Mustang GT in the 80s. I washed it at 6:00 am before high school if it rained overnight. I recently bought a 2025 60th Anniversary after having practical, family car for 30+ years. This will be my fun car until I leave this planet, at which time it will go to my sons. I want to enjoy it as much as possible while I can. That’s my barometer. I will take very good care of her, my wife is already jealous.

So for me, if the whipple increases my enjoyment, without unduly harming my beloved, I want one.

 

[robvas]

Plenty of whipple cars go 100k

You try to make a ton of power and beat on it every day, you're going to break stuff but that goes for a non-supercharged car, too.

 

[MustangMitch69]

I don’t believe you will get even half of it back from what I’ve seen .
I am debating Whipple for my DH as well.
But I just can’t justify it.
$12k + tires and wheels so $15k minimal on a 24 premium that I got for $4k under sticker and still feel like I’d be pissing away $12k.
I will road course the car , not drag race is another factor.
I love pushing the performance and want more but just can’t justify it.
I have the money but it’s just not smart money at 46.
You crash and you’re fucked if you don’t insure the work with expensive insurance.
Just my2 cents.
I just want a Wengerd e85 tune and I’d be happy!

Same here, I have the money, but it's just not necessary for daily city and highway driving. 486 horses is already enough if not excessive.

I'm sure it's fun just like certain drugs are fun, but I'm not 20 years old anymore, and at this point in my life longevity is more important to me than fleeting thrills.

2 weeks ago I looked at a Ferrari and my wife was pissed, not because of the money, but because she thinks the mustang looks better!

 

[Jekyll_Hyde]

Same here, I have the money, but it's just not necessary for daily city and highway driving. 486 horses is already enough if not excessive.

I'm sure it's fun just like certain drugs are fun, but I'm not 20 years old anymore, and at this point in my life longevity is more important to me than fleeting thrills.

2 weeks ago I looked at a Ferrari and my wife was pissed, not because of the money, but because she thinks the mustang looks better!

IMO a mustang is a cooler car. Why did u look at a Ferrari if ur not interested in fleeting thrills?

 

[MustangMitch69]

IMO a mustang is a cooler car. Why did u look at a Ferrari if ur not interested in fleeting thrills?

I was looking at a used Portofino M, which is much more of a touring car than a race car. I like its sleek and aerodynamic design, retractable hardtop, and also its handling precision (lighter chassis, advanced suspension). Love how the mustang looks too, although you can't deny that during spirited driving (NOT racing) you really feel the weight of the car, and when you turn the steering wheel you don't have 100% confidence in where exactly the wheels are pointing. It's not as much of a "straight line car" as the Dodge's, although certainly moreso than the European cars. Are those upgrades worth the $150K+ difference? Certainly not, for most people.

 

[zpduff]

I was looking at a used Portofino M, which is much more of a touring car than a race car. I like its sleek and aerodynamic design, retractable hardtop, and also its handling precision (lighter chassis, advanced suspension). Love how the mustang looks too, although you can't deny that during spirited driving (NOT racing) you really feel the weight of the car, and when you turn the steering wheel you don't have 100% confidence in where exactly the wheels are pointing. It's not as much of a "straight line car" as the Dodge's, although certainly moreso than the European cars. Are those upgrades worth the $150K+ difference? Certainly not, for most people.

Ferrari makes beautiful cars. "A Ferrari" was always my dream car growing up, I'll never own one, but damn they look good.

Sponsored