2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada)

[Dub347sbf]

Take it with a grain of salt, probably.

https://fordauthority.com/2023/05/2024-ford-mustang-fuel-economy-revealed-for-certain-variants/

**New-released figures from Natural Resources Canada's 2023 Fuel Consumption Guide converting from Canada’s standard of liters consumed per 100 kilometers**

• 2.3L EcoBoost MPG (10-speed auto): 22 city / 33 highway / 26 combined
• 2.3L EcoBoost Performance Pack MPG (10-speed auto): 21 city / 29 highway / 24 combined
• 5.0L GT MPG (10-speed auto): 15 city / 24 highway / 18 combined
• 5.0L Dark Horse MPG (6-speed manual): 14 city / 22 highway / 17 combined

Sponsored

 

[IceGamer]

Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system?

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...

 

[Dub347sbf]

Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system?

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...

The 5.2 Predator GT500 is rated at 12/18/14 combined not 14/21.....

The Mach 1 was 15/23/18 combined for auto, 14/22/17 combined for manual, so the Dark Horse looks like is the same. Looks in line with what i would expect. But still taking it with a grain of salt until real numbers come out. The 1300 gas guzzler would put highway numbers closer to 21 for Dark Horse.

 

[IceGamer]

https://brandonford.com/blog/2021-ford-mustang-lineup-gas-mileage-ratings

I got my numbers from there...

Anyhow, I would expect roughly the same numbers that the Mach 1 had.

 

[wilkinda65]

Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system?

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...

Brandon Ford is my local dealer where I buy all my Fords from since 2005. In fact its where my new 2024 Was ordered at

 

[OppoLock]

Don't compare to EPA numbers. Different testing methods. Here's the realest comparison.

A quick reference for the EB w/ 10AT on the frugal end and Mach 1 w/ 6MT on the thirsty end. Should be a non-surprise given that these things are basically identical, so would come down to aero tweaks more than anything. The "differences" could be statistical noise and rounding errors tbh.

2024 EB w/ 10AT
MPG: 22 CITY / 33 HWY / 26 COMBINED

2023 EB w/ 10AT
MPG: 21.4 (21) CITY / 31.77 (32) HWY / 25.29 (25) COMBINED

2023 -> 2024 NET: +1 CITY / +1 HWY / +1 COMBINED

2024 DH w/ 6MT
MPG: 14 CITY / 22 HWY / 17 COMBINED

2023 M1 w/ 6MT
MPG: 13.61 (14) CITY / 20.82 (21) HWY / 16.13 (16)COMBINED

2023 -> 2024 NET: 0 CITY / +1 HWY / +1 COMBINED

2023 numbers for reference. Source.

 

[Dub347sbf]

Looks like they added the auto Dark Horse now. The manual is pretty close to the Mach 1, the auto is a little worse.

 

[IFFV68]

The 5.2 Predator GT500 is rated at 12/18/14 combined not 14/21.....

The Mach 1 was 15/23/18 combined for auto, 14/22/17 combined for manual, so the Dark Horse looks like is the same. Looks in line with what i would expect. But still taking it with a grain of salt until real numbers come out. The 1300 gas guzzler would put highway numbers closer to 21 for Dark Horse.

The Real Numbers are what mileage you get on Your Mustang.
Not the Numbers the Government Says You Should or may Get?

Sponsored