• Welcome to Mustang7G!

    If you're joining us from Mustang6G, then you may already have an account here!

    As long as you were registered on Mustang6G as of March 10, 2021 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password!

Dub347sbf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Threads
41
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,221
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang Dark Horse
Take it with a grain of salt, probably.

https://fordauthority.com/2023/05/2024-ford-mustang-fuel-economy-revealed-for-certain-variants/

**New-released figures from Natural Resources Canada's 2023 Fuel Consumption Guide converting from Canada’s standard of liters consumed per 100 kilometers**
  • 2.3L EcoBoost MPG (10-speed auto): 22 city / 33 highway / 26 combined
  • 2.3L EcoBoost Performance Pack MPG (10-speed auto): 21 city / 29 highway / 24 combined
  • 5.0L GT MPG (10-speed auto): 15 city / 24 highway / 18 combined
  • 5.0L Dark Horse MPG (6-speed manual): 14 city / 22 highway / 17 combined

S650 Mustang 2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada) 2024-mustang-mpg-fuel-economy-epa


S650 Mustang 2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada) 1683748885681-
Sponsored

 

Attachments

IceGamer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
433
Reaction score
419
Location
Germany
Vehicle(s)
BMW G20 330d xdrive
Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system? :D

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...
 
OP
OP
Dub347sbf

Dub347sbf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Threads
41
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,221
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang Dark Horse
Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system? :D

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...
The 5.2 Predator GT500 is rated at 12/18/14 combined not 14/21.....

The Mach 1 was 15/23/18 combined for auto, 14/22/17 combined for manual, so the Dark Horse looks like is the same. Looks in line with what i would expect. But still taking it with a grain of salt until real numbers come out. The 1300 gas guzzler would put highway numbers closer to 21 for Dark Horse.
 
Last edited:

wilkinda65

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
1,749
Reaction score
663
Location
Sun City Center, FL
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang GT Premium
Can someone translate these numbers for the rest of the world - meaning the metric system? :D

Besides, those numbers look somewhat bad... According to BrandonFord dealer the S550 did 16 and 25 and the 5.2 Predator engine did 14 and 21... Seems like a decend downgrade from the old numbers besides marginal power gains... Again, I don't know my way around imperial metrics but my first impression is that I would've expected higher numbers.

Not that I care about fuel consumption but our government does and may cause further turbulences for the EU version...
Brandon Ford is my local dealer where I buy all my Fords from since 2005. In fact its where my new 2024 Was ordered at
 


OppoLock

RWD Addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
3,117
Reaction score
1,568
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT, 2020 GT350
Don't compare to EPA numbers. Different testing methods. Here's the realest comparison.

A quick reference for the EB w/ 10AT on the frugal end and Mach 1 w/ 6MT on the thirsty end. Should be a non-surprise given that these things are basically identical, so would come down to aero tweaks more than anything. The "differences" could be statistical noise and rounding errors tbh.

2024 EB w/ 10AT
MPG: 22 CITY / 33 HWY / 26 COMBINED

2023 EB w/ 10AT
MPG: 21.4 (21) CITY / 31.77 (32) HWY / 25.29 (25) COMBINED

2023 -> 2024 NET: +1 CITY / +1 HWY / +1 COMBINED

2024 DH w/ 6MT
MPG: 14 CITY / 22 HWY / 17 COMBINED

2023 M1 w/ 6MT
MPG: 13.61 (14) CITY / 20.82 (21) HWY / 16.13 (16)COMBINED

2023 -> 2024 NET: 0 CITY / +1 HWY / +1 COMBINED

2023 numbers for reference. Source.

S650 Mustang 2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada) 1683749128034

S650 Mustang 2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada) 1683748885681
 
OP
OP
Dub347sbf

Dub347sbf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Threads
41
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,221
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2024 Mustang Dark Horse
Looks like they added the auto Dark Horse now. The manual is pretty close to the Mach 1, the auto is a little worse.
S650 Mustang 2024 Mustang GT & EcoBoost MPG Fuel Economy Numbers (from Canada) 1686338090900
Sponsored

 
 




Top