The MT82-D4 needs 4.09 gears. Compared to the TR6060 in the Camaro, you're in each gear for longer. Part of that is the gear ratios and part of that is the Coyote engine revs about 1,000rpm farther.
MPH ranges of each gear (2nd, 3rd, 4th):
(3.55) MT82D4: 28, 39, 50
(3.73) TR6060: 30, 33, 38...
It wasn't 30%, but wasn't it a known fact that the DH didn't have the "feature" that the GT had where one of the TB's would slightly close at high RPM? I seem to remember it being a discovery when the cars first came out
There's a few answers to that question. The ECU can guess based on AFR etc and add fuel accordingly (the 'old' way, called a flex tune), or the flex fuel logic can be enabled in the ECU. Or, you can run an e85 specific tune that basically just adds way more timing and fuel. In that case the ECU...
The stock tune is going to pull timing on 91 so you it's not like you can add timing and gain power with an aftermarket tune.
93 or ethanol (whether it's e30, e50, e85...) will allow more timing therefore more power.
What graph are you looking at? The aftermarket tune added power everywhere and extended the powerband another 500 RPM
Where are you getting "narrower" from? It didn't lose power anywhere and the powerband didn't "shift"
Depends on the car. The EcoBoost Mustang doesn't like having much more than 100-150hp added to it on the stock engine. That's not much (percentage wise, 30-50%) compared to what you can add to say, a Coyote.
You really don't need to change anything. Sure, for traction you'll probably want to...
It holds almost all of that to 8,000 rpm though.
It's all about average HP anyway. I'm sure they could have found a peakier cam profile.
Their S550 car had comp cams stage 3 bumps ticks in it, 570-something on the dyno, with a cobrajet.