Ford really should have tried to imitate the NA 4.2l V8 from Audi. Yeah it's down on power but it revs so fast and clean the Coyote is still trying to ponderously climb the tachometer and I'm in the next gear and hauling ass without the agricultural thrashy-thrashy going on up front.
With Ford...
An AT's state is deterministic - it has sensors and mechanical switches. Furthermore the solenoids that control gear selection are 100% under computer control and so while even in Park, the computer can command the solenoids to the Neutral position.
Manual transmissions have NONE of those...
how are you going to start the car? There's a clutch pedal interlock for a reason. The easy way to get remote revving is to hire a midget to use a cane/broomstick from the back seat when you instruct him to do so over the earpiece.
I reckon a couple degrees of cam lobe change (overlap) or more likely slightly taller lobe is enough to get that inconsequential peak at favorable RPM. Or maybe it's a tweak to VCT set points.
hate to break it down for you but 58k in 2016 is 72k today. Don't you just LOVE currency destruction?
https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/2016?amount=58000
If I wag 2023 inflation at only 8% we're looking at 77K.
but down on torque. :) So Ford,are you lying now or were you lying then?
6HP is just measurement error. If "doubling" the available throttle body and air filter area yields basically no gains, I guess the original config was good enough afterall.