Man you canât say my arguments donât hold water and start bringing up SUVs. Lmao. SUVs like the Bronco, Wangler etc eventually got 4 doors because 2 doors in a segment like SUVs is ultra inconvenient. Youâre lumping something in there with entirely different context and not something Iâm talking...
I get the point youâre trying to make but me and @BoostRabbitGT went over that. SUV you canât compare because of context with 2 door SUVs being really impractical in a segment popular for space.
The Charger did well but had a different design, transmission, and design from its coupe counterpart...
I agree with you on that. Itâs just a very fragile thing to navigate for Ford. Itâs one of those things where there are examples on the market, but they were done way different than how Ford is doing it.
Like you said, if it wasnât a 5.0 with an auto you would consider the GT instead, isnât...
Well yeah thatâs the point, we want to preserve the Mustang and keep it around longer right?
Iâve said it before on here but the main reason is if price is the same, options are the same youâre just cannibalizing sales of the Mustang. Coupe is a niche product so youâre mainly attracting...
Thatâs what Iâve noticed too going to the dealer and placing an order for a Mustang. Even the salesman joking said âyou want to throw a Mach E in there too?â đ
I mean thatâs the consensus across every form of media Iâve seen so far. People want a performance sedan, majority doesnât like the Mustang name and the people who donât mind donât care either way.
It was also referenced in the GT500 thread but Porsche did the same thing with the 911. They both continued to update obsessively and protect the car at all costs.
Itâs well known that GM will kill off anything that can remotely compete with the Vette. Itâs always seen as crazy, but after...
They made the car to be compliant but it didnât have to have the name to do so. Originally it had 2 different names.
Youâre right. Porsche made sure to develop the 911 thing like crazy and protect it, almost bankrupting themselves. Eventually coming out with the cayman/boxter and Cayanne suv to...
I get what youâre saying. You could still do a Mustang you would just have to lean on the body style then. Itâs like the situation with the Mach E, if it were a EV coupe I donât think anyone wouldâve been as upset. The Mach E in current form only shares some styling cues and a badge with the...
Well at this point itâs one of its defining characteristics today combined with its body style, accessibility (even with price), and manual transmission. As far as sports cars go itâs in rare air now, itâs a classic formula but now itâs unique.
Iâve been looking to get back into one because...
Speaking of AWD.
Mach 4 is a better name for a performance AWD system, like GR Four, symmetrical AWD, or Quattro.
Mach 4 AWD for quicker launches makes sense.
Iâm not surprised itâs around, even on its down years it outsells a lot of sports cars.
Thatâs also the interesting thing about the name, more people hate the name than people who donât mind it. Everyone wants a sedan. Since thatâs the only issue itâs funny that Ford doesnât change that one...
Like I was saying earlier, if it costs the same, has the same features, it just gonna cannibalize sales though. Because with a sedan youâre introducing the average consumer, and they donât care about the name. If they want a sedan and the only one is a Mustang one theyâll get it regardless.
Not...
Speaking of 4 doors, apparently TKs garage made a video with his âsourcesâ saying a Chevy SS might be coming back. Obviously take it with a boulder size of salt because heâs usually wrong about anything other than mopar stuff. Also recently Camaro development was halted.
But I wanted to talk...
Multimatic reminds me of Kar Kraft more so. Shelby was like the early Ford Performance/SVT team. I see what you mean though.
Someone on the forums said it best, what Shelby used to do just doesnât cut it today really. They have their niche still. They both still have some of that Shelby spirit...