Recent content by Zelek

🤣🤣🤣

I got a good laugh at these results. Ford marketing got what they wanted.

The 5.0 has been rock solid reliable for many years. This engine will be no different and in fact has stronger connecting rods. Get a reliable tune and you have nothing to worry about. If your tuner pushes every bit of timing possible out because you wanted them to, then you can kiss your...

I'd be more curious when someone unlocks E85 for the ECU. Screw the Ford Performance tune nonsense. It's way too mild.

Ford coming on here to see who's warranty to void in the FI section.

If your order hasn't been converted to a 23 by now, it's not being built.

I still wouldn't put 87 octane in my Mach 1 when I rev it out to 7800 RPM. Besides, it's tuned for 93/E85 and redlines at 8k. Stop being cheap shits and put the right fuel in it.

Mach 1 HP was a bargain back in 21 especially if you got it under 2% invoice pricing. That comes out to around $58k + TTL. I paid MSRP for mine because of the cancellation of my order. :frown:

So far Ford has only given Whipple any sort of permission as far as tuning goes and we all know Whipple's tunes are heavily conservative in comparison with an aftermarket tuner. How is a locked down ECU superior?

Why are you drag racing a car with coolers meant for road coursing? You people are silly. Same goes for people who drag race a Mach 1. There's a GT for a reason.

Until the Voodoo fails, have fun with that one.

Since when does running E85 mean you're only chasing 1/4 mile times? You do realize you can road course on E85 too, right? All I'm saying is until someone cracks it, the Mach 1 is superior to any of these due to the fact that it can be tuned. If you're worried about your warranty for bolt ons...

Reading through this whole thread as I'm currently tuning my Mach 1 on E85 which will have more power than any of these and a GT350 in stock form. Lol. The fact that you can't tune these will be a huge turn off to me. The stock tunes always feel so mild and the lack of using E85 is really...

Wrong or not, that's still 500 rpm too low!