The mustang/Camaro/dodge in 2015 was in an era of lack of cheap high performance sporty vehicles. Now in the era of affordable evs and more expensive gasoline, I doubt the s650 will do nearly as well as the s550 did. A model 3 RWD can be had for $45K and a performance AWD variant is $55K. And in...
I don't think mustangs will have a backlog outside any artificial limitation on the dark horse. Mustangs price has creeped up and with federal and local rebate (totalling $13K in my part of Cali) for a EV like a Tesla its a harder sell. The Model 3 Performance at $55K - $13k= $42K offers amazing...
The 3.0 Turbo makes 400hp/400 torque in Lincoln cars right now. Those Atkin won’t be in a mustang due to the power they Make. The 3.3 makes ~300 hp in the F150. It’s a cyclone like the v6 mustangs
Fords performance line up is also a Beaming icon. Mustangs represents an idea aswell as a goal. You don’t see Toyota Camry as a background wallpaper, poster, nor does it garner desire on the eyes of others. There’s always something more than just sales figures.
On another note, Mustang will...
'Shelby' but yes I bet the majority owners would want a gt350. However they're extremely limited in supply and not part of the standard mustang lineup
That's implying future mustang wouldn't adopt a closed up ecu to prevent tuners from frying the motors.
No way, ford invested too much into the ecoboost already. I doubt the electric motor will be given to a base model car, it seems to be put into the top mustang in the s650. My guesses anyway
U see the eb and v6 aren't pushing 400+ horsepower stock and they aren't on the top of the food chain. It's like a BMW 300 series owner trying to match up to the BMW m3. Who said everyone is all loving? Read half the thread.
While it'll probably be good performer, stop comparing it to the 918. 918 uses exotic materials and costs $1M. All wheel drive, dual clutch and the like would make the current 5.0 motor do sub 4 seconds.