Another solid data point...
Car and Driver tested both the Dark Horse and the 392 Durango to both run a 4.1 second 0-60
but we all know the Dark Horse is a way faster car (it will put a bus length on it after 60)
"high performance package", sorry. And without it the EcoBoost loses all of its handling and braking which is what those dorks seem to love so much. So it would get destroyed even more around a track.
don't use 0-60 because it doesn't jack, gets measured differently by every source, relies too...
We're going to need the performance package on the EcoBoost so the price is closer to 37k
Please don't use 0-60 for anything. Use a full quarter mile or laptime. Which the CTR beats the ecoboost in either.
Costs a little more but it's by far the better car.
This is the dumbest argument people can throw out there. A 60' Mustang would get smoked by a minivan. Who cares?
Besides, plenty of the 420-something cubic inch mustangs from the 60's ran 13's in the 1/4 mile back then in the magazine tests, so with a modern tire on them they'd easily beat...
Great performance?
Compared to?
A Civic Type R will kick its ass if you want to compare to four cylinder sports cars.
And they run the 1/4 mile like a 3V Mustang GT from 2005
I fail to see the appeal.
An engine with the nickname "Ecoboom" is reliable?
They can sound okay. But most of them do not. And the old 4.6/5.0 sounded much better.
I don't know who this guy is so I'm not picking on him it's just one of the first hits on Youtube (and if you're on here don't get your panties in a bunch).
This car sounds like total shit. Just loud and...