Search results

Same thing with my girl's Bronco Sport. Vehicles in other markets have them, but the US versions don't.

I have no idea what it would look like on this vehicle if it could be added. Sometimes these things work and sometimes, they don't. To someone comfy/cozy with FORScan, they would just need to try and see what happens.

Well, if you or anyone wants to try, I would enable MCS soft button here: This setting for SCPK may or may not be relevant, but worth noting. My truck has SCPK disabled, but I have both a hard camera button and a button on the touchscreen to access the multicamera menu bar.

Do you remember what you changed when you tried?

If there's one thing I've learned: Codes are not problems.........only problems are problems. Both my vehicles have codes they are reporting due to modifications I did. I just ignore them because I am getting the desired results I want. As long as I have no lights on the dash, these soft codes...

Maybe with FORScan. There is existing configuration in the APIM to put a camera button on the touchscreen.

Correct. Ford implemented some kind of AI cybersecurity system towards the end of last year. If the AI suspects any kind of activity that falls outside of how Ford feels FDRS should be used, it will auto-ban the account. If that happens, there is no number to call. All you can do it email them...

FJDS and FDRS is the same thing. FDRS will 100% work on your car. Removed the rest of my post for several reasons. To anyone that saw it and is interested, message me.

Yea, FDRS cannot be used to flash firmware that belongs to another car without doing some shady stuff that is part of the reason they locked down FDRS the way they did. Lots of hacks out there messing up the data on vehicles by doing things the wrong way and now we all suffer for it. Either...

Yea, FDRS is not cheap anymore. Either way, you would not be able to obtain the files. We would need someone with an automatic to use FDRS to get the files and then use FORScan to flash them on the manual cars. Or, someone can use FDRS and type the VIN of automatic car and hope the new AI...

Well, I have some bad news. The PSCM and the ABS module on the automatic and the manual cars have different firmware.....the calibration files are different. This most likley means that to get this to work, we would need to obtain the raw calibration files using FDRS to flash them with FORScan...

@ChillinDylan For ACC and IACC, it makes sense that there are things needed in the PCM and ABS since the vehicle accelerates and slows down on its own as part of the operation. However, this is not the case for lane centering and lane keeping. At this point, I am not sure if lane centering...

I agree. I am reaching at this point.

You can try. As long as everything that's been tried doesn't spit out a code for incompatible config, there is still a chance this will work.

Found something else in the IPMA. Below is from a 2025 Mustang GT 401A automatic: Here is that same line on a 2025 401A manual: Assuming the LCA is lane centering assist and LKA is lane keep assist, I think it is worth a try at this point. There is also something about lane keeping...

The one I posted on post #65 is from a 401A vehicle.

I love this kind of stuff. Unfortunately, I don't have one of these cars myself to experiment with stuff, but I have learned a lot about these things dealing with issues my truck had and helping a lot of people on the F150, Lightning and Mach E forums. You'd be surprised how similar all these...

That's exactly what I do.

The battery pull won't hurt to try. Disconnect the negative cable and leave it unplug for 20 minutes to make sure everything de-energizes and rully resets. If the issue remains, then the ACM is bad.

Got your message, but responding here for the sake of the info being out there. As of today, your car started reporting some ACM codes that are 100% related to your issue. It looks like the ACM took a sh*t. I am also seeing a config related code in the ACM and IPC. I assume you made some...