Search results

i believe these are digital changes. Easy to accomplish for Ford, costing hardly anything and not adding complexity to production. could be wrong, but that’s what it sounded like.

i believe thes

of course they can do whatever they want - hence calling an SUV a pony car. that doesn’t mean it sits well with fans and customers. the name dark horse doesn’t bother me. It’s good to give it a name that doesn’t have such lofty expectations to fall short of. it seems more like a Mach 1...

its not the name (though it shared the same logo). It’s the tier. It’s the absolute pinnacle of the mustang lineup. And each better than the generation before. Any downgrade from the current gt500 will not be called Cobra or GT500.

disagree. If it were called Boss 302 or Mach 1, no one would have an issue. 500 horsepower and handling to boot? Maybe better as a Mach 1 than a boss, since the gt350 had 526 hp. The boss is more of a legendary car than Mach 1, so much would be expected of a car called “Boss.” Perhaps Ford...

incorrect. The cobra was the top tier. Highest performance. Once it went FI, Ford bever looked back. The gt500 also was not supercharged originally. But since it took the Cobra slot, it was. No going backward now. The dark horse is a lesser car than cobra or Shelby status. Boss/Mach 1=dark...

Reflection flare.

it’s not about that. Since the Terminator, ALL COBRA/SHELBY GT500s have been forced induction cars. it would be a major backward step to take that away and still call it Cobra. progress my friend. Not regression. Progress.

only if it was supercharged or twin turbo.

definitely better than the absolutely lame rounddog holes in the Mach 1. But really that’s no excuse for a horrible grille. Sure, it’s functional. But so is the GT WHICH DOES IT WAY BETTER AND UTILIZES THE WHOLE FASCIA FOR ITS CARIOUS FUNCTIONS. THE DARK HORSE FASCIA IS MORE NON FUNCTIONAL...

looks like the eco boost with an RTR grille and some pointy plastic on the lower grille.

we will agree to disagree. Most “Camaro” comments seem to have a leader with some followers tagging on. And they seem to leave the s550 out of the discussion, just like the gentlemen that posted the Camaro snd s650 while leaving the s559 out. When you look at the s550 and s650 side by side, they...

The grey plastic under the laughter/surrounding the grille won’t she well. Doesn’t look that great now. the flyer on pointy bits sticking up from the lower grille… just looks so lazy. The nasty RTR aftermarket grill was gross years ago. So sad to see Ford adopt it on a brand new model. the...

bruh. C’mon. It’s THE EXACT SAME platform, roofline, windows, fenders, headlight shape, grille shape, and in the case of GT and eco boost, headlight shape. The haunches at the rear are exactly the same as well, just widened a tiny bit to accommodate more track. The same bulge is there on s550 as...

Interesting. In my view, The GT looks great. Like that’s how this refresh is supposed to look. dark horse just looks like an aftermarket company oldified the front end Doesn’t look modern or cool. Looks exactly like the OLD RTR aftermarket grill without the gross “nostril” lights. the dark...

… you forgot a dark 2015-2017 s550 in that comparison. But thanks for the pics probing my point anyway.

i doubt the Mustang team would ever arrive to designsomething that resembles a failed design. The rear was wide bodied to give it more track. Will translate to better handling and looks cool. It’s more reminiscent of Ferrari Roma or Aston Martin (which the s550 100% resembles) and looks like a...

that’s in an awful lot of cars, including s550.

there is ZERO Camaro from the side. From the side, it’s nearly identical to s550.

i wouldn’t worry about the dash. It’s almost the exact same thing Mercedes’ is doing and there is no glare problem. I have a bmw with a similar dash. Zero glare.