almost all SUVs have hatched. Doesnât make them a hot hatch. Love to stretch things eh? Go back to your play dough and have a blast.
I donât define the mustang. Irecognize what it is. Unlike some imagineers.
the mustang? Absolutely.
what? You want to pretend the f150 hasnât sold a bazillion times more every year since forever? FAR More per year than the Mach e? And all that time ford never felt the need to call the truck s mustang. Not even the lightning - an ev that used to use a supercharged v8...
the new Superman comic which has Clark Kentâs woke son take over sold huge itâs first issue. After 11 issues itâs now cancelled. LOL
thankfully that wonât happen with the Mach e because itâs an suv which is the hot item right now as all SUVs are. But the lame mustang badge is problematic more...
you said it. A CAR with 50 years of recognition.
exactly why it doesnât work as a sub sub brand.
Mustang is a car. Not words slapped on an suv
also nothing about the âoh no climate change!â Regulations mean of he mustang is going anywhere. It may be powered by something other than gasoline...
except they are just slapping the name on an SUV EV. Thatâs not a hot hatch. Lol
And there is discussion that it may not stop there.
And there is discussion that it may not stop there. Though thatâs already enough of a problem as is.
a mustang is a mustang. Not a soccer mom suv.
for...
the Mustang is already a sub brand of Ford.
sub sub brand is too diluted.
Mustang is a model, not a make.
as stated before, the Mach e being called mustang is a mistake snd will likely be resolved in the near future.
calling everything a mustang isnât a solution. All it does is cause the...
Iâve been at this game since before the Mach e launch.
already spelled out. No mustang fan post pics of competitor cars and calls them mustangs.
Pretty plain and simple.
again, go back and read what Isaid. Ford has had Shelby and SVT trucks as well. No one is bothered by that. Thatâs equivalent to bmws M. calling a performance division vehicle a performance division vehicle is logical. But calling a model one thing and then calling another totally different...
Wrong. Different companies and philosophies, not to mention products from other countries. America has done things differently for a long time.
Mustang doesnât go somewhere just because Ferrari does or bmw.
And besides that, your point has zero analogy.
Ferrari is making an electric suv...
literally no one misunderstands that some at Ford have an asinine desire to confuse the Mustang brand, dilute it into fairy dust and sprinkle that onto a bunch of other non- mustangs in the hope of turning those into mustangs and getting the public to buy more of them. Youâre trolling so hard in...
you mean like the â97-â93 Mustang GT?
That was the birth of the hot hatch I believe.
if it has more than two doors, better to call it something else though.
whats sad is that the confusing solution of the mustang name may end up contributing to the âdying awayâ which should never happen.
just build the BEST mustang sports car and donât get greedy with pricing. It will be loved. And bought.