I'd rather not while driving.
What I mean is that cars we've had with instant consumption display it shows as a constantly changing figure in line with throttle position etc.
Neither display in the Mustang does that. It's just a figure that slowly changes over time ie, the average.
OK, I just...
It's not that critical. It'll be fine.
During the mass supression of our population in 2021 my first service on that car was 4 months overdue. There was no concern from the dealer, and no one was doing high mileages anyway.
Can anyone tell me why the economy figure differs between the trip computer mode and the actual fuel economy display? And both are really slow to update.
I like it, it adds a litle bit of class. But the current exchange rate makes it a bit expensive down here, like everything.
I'll see if want becomes need.
Track day type tyres are all a bit suspect in the wet. I might even go to Mich PS5's next for mine. They're brilliant in the wet, last well, and I doubt I'll be doing any track days in the near future.
They certainly didn't feel lacking on my last car which was only a little lighter than the...
An idiot could destroy his car with a hose, or a car wash, I must be one level above an idiot because my cars look great. At least they do from a couple of metres way. The Mustang looks better than new still. Getting paint correction and ceramic coating from new paid off.
I'm getting between 14.7 and 18 litres per 100kms around town. Foot weight dependant.
I believe the particulate filters are the reason for the missing 50 horsies. Not sure of other differences.
It might be my vision, but HUD's don't work for me, and when I had a sunroof two cars ago, I rarely...