Search results

If there's one thing from the DHSC I hope doesn't trickle down to the Eco/GT refresh, it's the amber DRLs.

What will they think of next, a "Playboy Pink Pony Carbon Fiber Package" exclusively for the EcoBoost?!

Seriously. The pessimist in me thinks the Mustang will start at $100K in 40-50 years, if not sooner.

That would explain why there haven't been updates on the Mach-4 at all. The way things are going though, I don't think I'll be able to afford a new Mustang until I'm retired---and who knows if they'll still have V8s in them by then.

I've liked all sorts of cars ever since I was a kid. Thank car magazines for sparking my general interest there. As a recent example I got to test drive a '24 Impreza Sport hatchback (I wanted to see how a more common city commuter felt in comparison to my EcoBoost). The only nitpicks I had...

Personally I think the SC bumper will only be applied to the NA Dark Horse refresh/facelift. As for EcoBoost and GT, I have no idea how they're going to freshen them up. I am not looking forward to interior cameras in cars. Standard surround view I'd welcome, but the other way around sounds...

I didn't realize the S650s had all those features for their manuals. Were any of those in the S550s?

That (and this thread in general) is nuts.

Right now I highly doubt this car will be as revolutionary as the Model T. At the bare minimum I hope it looks less homely than when the Maverick truck first debuted. I have no idea how they'll make this fun to drive, or if they'll aim for engaging driving dynamics with this one.

For sure, I forgot to mention I really liked how it looked in person. Hopefully Adriatic Blue lasts for a while and even makes it onto the potential Mach-4 (but somehow I doubt it).

Finally saw one at a dealership with the non PP FX package. Adriatic Blue appears so much more teal than the majority of photos I've seen of it. Teal and green just might be the most difficult colors to get photos of accurately, from what I've seen.

I tried configuring a base GT to how I'd order it, and holy cow, when did it become as expensive as a similarly spec-ed GT Premium from a year or two ago? ($55K with 301A, automatic, active exhaust, and 3.55 drive ratio, in Oxford White)

Still waiting. Still want it to happen. But these days I'm skeptical whenever Farley has something to say about non-SUVs/trucks.

I'm still enjoying my EcoBoost a lot, but it might as well be a Prius with how little to no attention it gets from people. Honestly though I prefer it that way, staying under the radar from less savory folks.

Hopefully the next one isn't prefaced by "Here's our answer to the Mustang...MACH-E!"

If I read magazine reviews correctly, it seemed most of the time Camaro won over the Mustang during comparison tests. The better performer, if not the better seller or daily driver, if you will. But maybe I'm mistaken?

Camaro Eco Maiden (callback to the Iron Maiden?)

I clamor for cars in general. At least they're not clamoring for a Pri---oh wait, I've done that before. But seriously, if a new Camaro is what makes the Mustang improve either this gen or next, I'm all for it. And a potential Camaro sedan before the Mach-4...I'd love to see it happen if it...

I'm curiously excited about this, mainly to see if it'll retain its driving dynamics but in return gain much improved outward visibility.

Apparently the Mustang I've been daily driving for years now isn't called a Mustang according to Mr. Rocket Man (and I'm sure many more hardcore enthusiasts would agree with him). I just was being tongue-in-cheek if it wasn't obvious. 😁