Search results

Excuse the double reply, I'm scrolling through, but you are right. If I remember correctly, there were some people breaking quad digit HP numbers with a pulley and intercooler swap on the S550 GT500. I still think $145k is an abysmal price point for the track package, and $175k is absurd for...

I'm not quite sure where people are getting the idea that Ford is just dumping a blower on top of a motor and calling it a day. It is the exact same motor setup as the GT500, for better or for worse. I'm not trying to be prickly, don't get me wrong, but since this car leaked at the beginning of...

These numbers seem extreme, even for Ford. $108k for an unoptioned SC, $145k for one with the track package, and $176k for the launch edition? I know Ford's trying to target the Porsche brand, but I'm not sure this car is half-a-GTD money. Assuming these numbers are real, of course. I don't...

PPF is the ultimate solution. That's got a super-high cost of entry, so it's probably not immediately viable. I personally just wash and dry by hand once a week when it's warmer outside, and that kept my paint looking pretty mint. I go through a touchless with undercarriage in the winter more...

Just out of curiosity, how do you have this information? ...And how many are built in Molten Magenta? 😁

C'mon guys, where's the previous energy? The last thread had an overwhelmingly negative tone to it, and now we all like the car? That statement is a joke, for anyone who didn't catch on. But seriously, the reactions I've been reading on the internet is the reason why I'll take everything with a...

A financially irresponsible one, one who knows their way around numbers, or a group of them who pool money to buy and share one together. You would be surprised. A lot of Mustang owners I follow on social media apps are under thirty. Me personally I would prefer the DHSC over the C8, maybe the...

I linked the press release in my most recent comment. It comes from a performance merchant.

For those wondering where this is coming from, you can see it at this Facebook post along with some additional images. I personally am beginning to fall for this car, hard. It looks stunning in SB.

One could argue that title goes to the GTD. If they wanted to use that statement, they would need to word it as "Second most advanced Mustang ever". Doesn't quite sell as well to the under-informed as "Most advanced Dark Horse", and we are not their only target audience.

First thoughts are that this car does look way better in the flesh than the leaked render that looks like a Ford intern put together using the lowest possible polygon object, and just sculpted it enough to loosely resemble this. I'm not happy they chose Dark Horse SC over something like "Cobra"...

That front angle looks significantly better in my opinion, but unfortunately the proportions are incorrect relative to the actual spy shots we've seen. I knew I couldn't have been the only one seeing it.

Yup, Ford just dropped a teaser on their Instagram. I guess the leaks about calling it a Dark Horse-whatever were legitimate. Please Ford, just use Dark Horse Boss and not Dark Horse SC, the latter sounds terrible.

It'll grow on me.

Seems like the post has either been removed, or the link is broken.

I can't tell if that black piece in the center is part of the wing, or if it's a vent...

Statistically speaking there's at least one person in here who's seen what's next already...

Why do half the threads on this forum now trend towards devolution into an argument??

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I am... not sure where they went - hold on, let me see if I can find them...

I don't think there's any problem with comparing raw sales personally, but I do think a little bit of nuance should be considered. I'm being completely honest, I have seen a strong uptick in S650s on the road, but I can still count on one hand the number of GTs I've seen, other than mine. So...