The M1 was the best they could do with that horrific 18+ refresh look, but the DH is easily the better looking of the two. The M1 is comparable to the new GT PP in terms of performance anyways
It amazes me to see the living conditions of some of the people driving around in Mach 1s, GT350s and boosted coyotes, but its also why I love the mustang community. These people are passionate about their cars
The base 2015 GT MSRP was $32K, without the PP. The 2022 GT MSRPs at 38K. The 2024 will probably MSRP at $41K. That's 28% in 9 model years and no more base calculator screen
This is really an individual question, but sticking to 10% of your annual income for car payments is a decent rule. Simplified example: $50k financed for 5 yrs = $10k per year, so you'd need to make ~$100k/yr (also need to factor in the above mentioned costs)
They all have the split, it's just that the way the light is hitting this one, it looks like carbonized grey. If you zoom in really close you can tell it's still gloss black
That's what I'm saying. He spends more time on here than I do and I'm buying the car. 2.2k messages and only 200 reactions to his name. Popular guy
Aside from the new GT being a beast, Ford did us a solid by releasing the DH at the same time to give us the choice, rather than wait another 6-7...
We already know that Whipple has a supercharger in the works and I'm positive others have been given Fords blessing. If anything there will be an exodus of unreliable tuners
Stop reaching. The car isn't even out yet and you're using tuning as an argument? lol. By this time next year the DH will be cracking 10s in the 1/4 running NA
All smiles here. I'll take 486 easy. I agree with @OppoLock that dark horse pricing better be real reasonable. Personally if the choice was between a decently optioned GT performance for ~$50k and a DH for anything more than $60k that's easy