Motortrend Published 12.5 MT82 1/4 mile with the new fully spec GT while the Mach 1 does it in 12.6. However the skid pad numbers of the GT were not great nor were the braking numbers. This does mean a Tremac Mach 1 with HP will be faster on track than an S650 GT PP1 MT82. This is expected...
I don't know why people want a mid-engine Mustang instead of all aluminium body for example. The all steel body is the biggest reason why the Mustang is so heavy. If you want to fight with Porsche do what Porsche did with the 911 make it 70+% Aluminium. I was in LA in 2018 when they revealed the...
it's $300,000 because it has a full carbon body, SLA front suspension, F1 rear suspension, $20,000+ Shocks, $20,000 magnesium wheels and it's going to be hand build in 2000 cars. As you can imagine the RND budget of that car is insane. A mass produced Mid-Engine car is going to cost way less...
They did promise us a Poster Boy Mustang didn't they ? This is definitely something to hang on the wall. Not that a Dark Horse R is not the same thing you can have lot's of cool Posters of the GTD or Dark Horse R on the walls at home or at the Garage.
I think the price tag is a bit steep even...
Or there is no mid-engine car and we are going to only see a GTD (think Porsche GT3) Mustang. It will be cool to see especially if they manage to keep the cost down somehow though if it's using the 5.4L Coyote that is going to be one hell of an expensive car. And then there is the big question...
On Saturday I was on the track with a friends Mach 1 A10. Both cars my 2017 GT and his Mach 1 were hitting 240 F CHT's. The Mach 1 was fast to recover the temps but was still hitting temps that were pulling timing out. Dark Horse use the same coolers as a Mach 1. Dark Horse R on the other hand...
move to real tires get a few more days, move to better suspension and you will start seeing temps that pull timing out of the car and the whole fun. You would think DH will be better but to be fair it will not be. There is a good reason why the DH R has upgraded cooling everywhere.
Based on the GTD in the Photos we can safely assume is a Street GT3 car considering GTD is the category that GT3 is replacing in IMSA. So I guess a street going GT3 and since GT3 is Porsche brand they needed to use the GTD.
Yeah but my point is not the price but the fact that while Mustang is getting heavier and heavier. The Porsche could be made that light and this is mostly because it's a 70% aluminium chassis.
thanks for sharing this links. I guess the GT will be 10-15 hp less than Dark Horse otherwise nobody will be buying it. Looks like the only reasonable car to buy in Eu is again the king BWM M2 it's cheaper same or more HP and will be faster as it has turbo on it.
This is only if you don't count the Mach-E as an Electric Engine, battery combo. I'm seeing they developing this more in the Mach-E branding than on the actual Mustang. With that been said I can't believe so much of you are arguing that a hybrid Mustang is needed. Why you want to add more pounds...
As I posted abough mine is modified for track duty but still around 1690-1700 kg and 420 hp. While the GTS 4.0 was on stock PZero tires and is around 1500 kg with 450 hp or so doing 100-200 in 9.5 while the Mustang does it in 12.5 on the 402 mile the Mustang don't stand a chance on a short...
My Mustang is heavy moded while his cars are stock. I'm very close in spec to a Mach 1 HP (2021 Ford Mustang Mach 1, 2:51.4) without aero but my local track is very slow so not Aero heavy. My Mustang is also on par lap time wise with a new G82 M3/M4 stock. But again we are talking stock cars vs...
The only real competitor here will be the new M2. I have a friend who own both RS3 and GTS4.0 and my 305/30 AR-1 2017 GT is faster than both cars on track. I do thing a Dark Horse even in Euro spec will be slow but the M2 will be on a totally different level and for sure cheaper in Europe. If...
In USA sure in Europe we only get the Digital Dash as the cars are GT Premium and 401A and Performance pack by default so are in the rest of the world.