Search results

Or . . . you could click on the link in the post # I provided and see what he was talking about.

Mustang is way too small for sax.

Cool66, I think you may still be around. Did you see AZ_Ryan's post? The radiator and oil cooler are working, but the car's computer has not been told that you installed them.

So this says 600W. The post after yours says only 100W go to the rear subwoofer. Is this an issue? Is it worthwhile paying attention to these numbers or no, and why or why not? (sorry, not a stereo guy, I have not installed aftermarket stuff since the 1980s)

The population of S650 Mustangs on the track is very small compared to S550, in spite of the presence of the Dark Horse, the Dark Horse handling package, the GT performance package, and the Ecoboost Mustang with performance package, with better brakes and additional cooling and other upgrades...

Very good looking 1969! :like:

I was reading review posted by robvas in post #25, which is a 2023 model with xDrive. I think everybody is talking about different cars because his earlier post did not say which car, and I added to the confusion by guessing and posting about a different car, and you may have been posting about...

No, not a functional one.

Google says 685 horsepower to the flywheel to hit 124 mph. 503 advertised is a big difference. That's not even advertising the wheel horsepower (584).

@Q6543 has some old threads where he was drag racing before he added the blower. He had some good times on just a good (drag) rear tire. EDIT: He is posted in this thread. It looks like he ran 12.0 on page one before the drag tire.

That's a nice car at a better than expected price. EDIT, well, not the as tested price. Launch control, something I wish the Mustang had. AWD, another great advantage. No wonder it has a 1 second 0-30 and a 2.8 0-60. As the article notes, these traction advantages make up 0.7 seconds in the...

Thanks. To make it fair we must turbo the Coyote with 15 psi, too. 🤣

So these cannot be installed on the stock set up in place of the camber plates that Ford supplied on my car?

Dark Horse 3992 lbs with automatic M2 CS 3770 lbs And it is 523 horsepower, so I do not even know if this is the car you are mentioning. It does have 61 lb ft of torque advantage over the Dark Horse in addition to the horsepower and weight advantages. This is why it does not come with a...

I see italics, like you are quoting something. What is your source? Which car? What does it weigh?

What rear tires?

I am glad you chimed in, as you probably have the most S650 track experience of anybody on this forum.

Could you please tell me a little more about why you say these things? 500 hp is the Dark Horse. With proper traction, it performs as a 500 horsepower car would at that car weight. With slicks, it generally runs 11.8 - 12.2, depending on conditions at the track. The 486 horsepower GT does...

Not really, but most believe that they underrate their horsepower figures. Whether that is true, I do not know, but nobody is going to sue BMW for fraud if they discover the car has more horsepower than advertised.

May put you off track, yes. But I am looking for examples of it happening to S650 cars. There are plenty of examples of it in the S550.