Search results

?? Wider contact patch puts the power down better.

Those are the "Performance Pack" wheels so they are 275 rear. Personally I think 305 should be the standard rear size for the GT.

It has the GT wheels and thd 5.0 badge.

The GT front definitely looks better than the Dark Horse.

I dunno, I've always thought the Performance Pack wing was the most tasteful wing on the S550. I wish my California Special had it.

Not for me. AWD is always welcome and with a light tune these things can push 450hp. Wouldn't doubt that the factory underrates the power a bit as well to keep it behind the M on paper.

I've already priced a M240i xDrive, loaded to my spec and it comes it at $57K. I really want a new GT Performance, but AWD is looking better all the time.

I find myself drawn to the GT Peformance over the Dark Horse. The negligible power difference isn't worth the $10-15K premium over the GT before dealer markups for someone who won't ever take it to the track. The items I wish the GT Performance offered would be 305 rear tires and the larger...

I've never trusted the JB4 tunes (or any other plug in tune). Always go to a reputable shop and get a proper tune - at least that's what I did with my VWs and never ran into any problems.

I'll miss the Premium Package California Special interior. The faux suede feels great and the red stitching really looks good.

Good: Everything except... Bad (fixable) - Give us the larger exhaust outlets from the Dark Horse on the GT

The M2 is ugly, but the M240i XDrive version is the one I'd go for anyway. Much better design than the M2 - which usually isn't the case. 380+ HP (underrated) that pulls 3.6 0-60 all day and with a VERY tunable engine will put out nearly 500HP without any engine modifications. This is on my...

I can't even grow hair....

Not saying it looks the same, but it looks the same....