Search results

From my understanding, ford engineered the mustang to oversteer easily to make it more fun to drive. Kinda like what Toyota did with the gt86. So the car being "unglued" isn't necessarily a bad thing imo.

What is your opinion on climate change and the current trend of global temperature averages increasing every year?

Would make sense, a boss with a hybrid system could easily make 550-600 hp, making it an excellent gt350 replacement providing they can nail the handling and keep the weight down. I've heard the voodoo won't be making a return, but the predator probably will, which is interesting. Imagine a halo...

What if it isn't a mach-1, but rather, the normal gt, maybe with a performance pack? When the mach-1 was revealed a few years ago, I had a feeling that it was essentially a mechanical precursor to the next gen gt. In that the next gen gt would get the tremec 6-speed, the same 5.0, and most of...

I see where you're coming from, I'm not a huge fan of how the grille sweeps down, it gives it kinda a funky shape. But I do like designs where the headlights and grille are one united and clean graphic that goes across the entire front end. Like what you see here, or one the new bronco or...

Always thought this was a really sharp looking generation of accord. It's a shame they aren't selling as well as Honda would like. Certainly looks better than the Camry or Altima imo.

Eh, I don't hate the mach-e, shocking I know. It's not like it replaced the coupe, it reduces ford's total carbon output, which as ford stated, makes it easier to prolong the existence of the normal mustang with a v8. It looks cool for an SUV, it's relatively fast, drives well in gt form, and is...

They're on the right track, but I noticed a few issues. The wheels are comically oversized, the headlights were just taken off the mach-e and need to be tweaked. They also made the mistake of making the grill opening massive, rather than having a moderately sized grill with a contrasting section...

Exactly, Dodge has actually confirmed that their ev muscle car will be shown in concept form this year. It wouldn't make sense for Dodge to reveal their muscle car so soon, yet for Ford to just wait things out with the mustang reveal.

That rendering is quite rough. But I wouldn't mind if it ended up looking similar to that.

Thanks for the additional insights as always man. So according to the timeline you provided, it appears as though the cd6 mustang was pretty far along in it's development before it was canned. I know part of the reason they killed off the cd6 s650 was to keep costs down. Part of me is wondering...

Or at the very least they were designed around the same time.

But getting back in track with this discussion, a hydrogen powered v8 would be a great idea for future mustangs. Doing gas only mustangs isn't going to be sustainable long term with increasing environmental regulations. Going with strictly evs would be a hard sale for a lot of hardcore...

You are talking about theories, not facts. There is actually a difference and I wish you would stop pushing your politics in this thread. Agreed, it is just a theory. But a theory that has a considerable amount of evidence to support it. When you get down to it, virtually everything that...

I can kinda see what you're talking about with the tri-bar theme in the headlights, how it's more spaced out like the mach-e's tri-bar design. But at the end of the day, the mach-e's design is just a take on mustang coupe design elements. So if we're complaining about the s650 using mach-e...

Isn't that rendering using an s550 body? Still lazy to rely on an existing design, but I can see why they did it.

Idk man, first off, as the s650 isn't an ev, I don't know what you mean by thanks ev. Secondly, the fender height looks to be comparable with the s550,with the headlights and grille looking slightly lower than the s550. Maybe you're right, time will tell. But for now, the front end on this...

I genuinely don't see any connection between those two designs.

I presume you're taking about climate change? That's been proven time and time again man. The earth has been shown to have many cycles of temperatures trending up and down over and over for billions of years. Humans didn't spark this trend of increasing global temperatures. But there's concrete...