If you say so.
I'm off to take a Harley badge and slap it on a Victory because they share design elements...
P.s. #5 Design elements do not make an SUV a Mustang.
It is not a Mustang, it will never be a Mustang, and no matter how much you stomp around and play your semantic games, it is not going to change that fact.
And yes you're a child. You're not getting your way and you will not accept it.
P.s. #4 Design elements do not make an SUV a Mustang...
Because I *knew* when I posted (again) what I considered a Mustang, you were gonna have a man-child tantrum and post pics of various coupes. And imagine that, you did exactly that.
P.s. Design elements do not make an *SUV* a Mustang.
Get it?
One more and then I'm done.
*Nowhere* in any of my posts did I say I don't accept your opinion(s). I completely and totally disagree with them. That's all. I promise you, you're gonna be alright. It's not the end of the world because I disagree with your opinion on what a Mustang is.
But since...
Look dude, go back and read my posts as I already stated it, and I'm not going to do it again. This has nothing to do with being close minded. It has to do with conmon sense.
P.s. Design elements do not make an SUV a Mustang.
Because nothing you say will make an SUV a Mustang, and can't swallow that fact. It eats at you to know that you can't change someone's opinion on that fact. Welcome to the new world we live in where nobody is allowed to have a differing opinion without man-childs like you throwing fits...
Good, then don't quote me, and run along. But just for fun, I'll break it down for you since sarcasm is not something you understand.
"Design elements" do not make an SUV a Mustang.
There is no doubt that it worked, but in doing so, they've basically put themselves in a corner regarding a "Mustang". Meaning, when we talk Mustangs in the future, what are we talking about? Car, suv, truck, family sedan, performance, pony car...
Lol! First, cry me a river. Second, what false information?
Wrong. Taillights don't make it a Mustang.
Good lord...
Nothing brillant about it, at all. It did exactly what it was meant to do. Sell it.
As mentioned earlier rather fantastically, how a an SUV vette?
Incorrect. A current 62k Model 3 performance Tesla can embarrass a GT. Maybe not on a road course, but not everyone road tracks their Mustangs. There is no need for a "performance" Mustang to be more than a Tesla.
Ford is learning real quick that folks are not getting what they paid for with...
Mach's were not sold because they were Mustangs. They were sold because they were EV's. For could have attached any name to it and it would have sold.
Nothing genius about Fords marketing. They have now pigeon holed themselves. They have severely limited themselves on the Ford brand. If that...
Disagree. If Ford can't stand behind a new nameplate for a newly developed vehicle, then don't build the damn thing. Using the Mustang as a brand is going to bite them in the ass. The Mach-E was given the Mustang badge to sell it, nothing more. Turns out, the Mach-E would have sold well if the...
Folks are completely missing the point. Ezra is claiming that the "Mustang" badge can be slapped on anything and it makes it a Mustang. Further if some don't feel that way, they are a narcissist. That is an absolutely piss-poor excuse for anything journalistic. It's a cop-out. It's an attempt to...
I've been in this car game a looooong time, and I can't remember *any* car review/preview/editorial in which a journalist flat out calls any of its readers a narcissist if they don't agree with the way a vehicle is headed.
You laugh at the New Coke analogy, and I'll die laughing at the Ford...
For me the 7th gen is doing exactly what it intends to do; build a bridge to full EV. Personally, I think if this was a full EV Mustang I would like it more. The interior is atrocious in a V8 that has a lineage back to the 60's, but would look fantastic in an EV. The rear end and front end would...