Search results

Why in the world would the 350/500 or any performance variants be on a shorter wheelbase than the GT? There well never be a two seat mustang. Mustang XL? WTF is this, 1986 in a parallel universe? I usually back the Pill, but this is some whack speculation.

Totally. If it lost a 6" section across the entire side it would look fantastic. Like Jake said, Ford should just stop being a bitch and go big(ger) with the Mustang. If they want to make it it's own "brand." Chevy went huge with the Vette.

It will be nice if it's really on the CD6. And if they keep it the same size. I have a '14 GT that I really like, and I'm fixing to skip the S550. If I was ready to buy a new car, I'd get a '20 GT-PP in Grabber Lime...but I'm just not ready. I'm really looking forward to the next gen. I hope...

Totally. And I have a huge hard-on for the Explorer ST. The new styling along with the CD6/longitudinal architecture....drool.

Sir, that was 25 FULL YEARS AGO. A quarter CENTURY. Really 27 model years. I have a theory that at some point a young person learns the value of money and what things cost, and that get's set in their mind. I'm 42. To me, a candy bar or a can of soda should cost 50 cents. Now they're $1.25...

I'd take a lighter smaller car with less power, if that's what it took for it to not grow even more.

Regarding continuing on the current chassis, or moving to the CD6. I remember a few years back Ford said hey, these are the chassis we are consolidating ALL our vehicles to. Focus Chassis/Escape CD6 for RWD or 4WD passenger cars Ranger chassis F-150 Chassis Super duty Chassis Combine this...

Yeah...no.

Meh. I'll stop buying Mustangs when the V8 is not available. I don't care what displacement. Hear that, Ford? I'll just buy the last V8 and that will be it. Sad.