Sir, trying to make weight reduction for accumulator
Checking google - says that 7 gen is another size then 6th
Some says
278x175x190
Another says
242x175x175
One more option
242x175x190
Maybe You can give reply? As I am really far from car… and we have only 2 DHs in Russia, second one is...
Well, sure we have here drag racing track and championship, link below
https://rdrc.ru/
We respect American cars, even have discipline on 1/4 among old USA cars called “Mad Buckets 🪣“
My friends on video below 👇
Mustang was my dream from childhood, but only at 35 I bought my first one 5gen...
There is no mistake, Sir
Torque we do in NM, BUT!… if numbers on the left side were in LB FT, then cross of power and torque was exactly at 5250rpm, like on screen below
So Math is correct, this is just another metric system
BTW,
I did 1 pull 0-60 with MT street R in 37F… look what I got with that huge mass and in very cold street…. Street R is the best tires type I think 🚀
Sure, Sir, I will try my best, but after winter. We have snow in Moscow now ⛄️
The main problem of car is - that we did 60kg (132lbs) of noise reduction, so it has with me 2000kg (4400lbs), I tried to make 1/4 on street in cold weather (about 50F), with stock heavy wheels, but result was...
Yes, Sir, we did only that was in the list
Also, Shoemaker did first tune and we tried it on Dyno, on street, sent him some longs and then he made second one - more aggressive and it showed better results. I think second one had stable 32* degrees, as first one was unstable and degree timing was...
Sir, as per Steeda dyno with same config, I see that the only difference is that we raised rpm till speed limit and Steeda I think made without speed limit, so my torque has to be more if there wouldn’t be speed limit I think
Actually, I am not big specialist in this, but car rides 7.9 with 4400lbs
About what parts are You talking?)
power in atmo = fuel and air. Fuel is enough, air - we use N/A their CAI = we have +/- same power except camshafts gain
I agree too with @robvas
if rotating mass doesn’t mean anything, that way we have to do on 500 crank HP car 500 whp on dyno….
But we see only 405… it means crank has to rotate transmission, driveshaft, gears, axles, brake wheels, wheels, tyers …
yes, sounds like truth 🤝
so from 500whp +1 gear (7th) will gain 15-18 whp
Light crankshaft and wheels gives nothing
C85 +10-15 from e85
total = 525-533 whp (we have 537)
32 degrees c85 (not e85)
regarding whp, You make mistake - light wheels and driveshaft will give less loss of power from crank = will give more whp
I don’t see here any fairytale - I saw guys from USA made 500 on 6th gear with same setup as me but without rotating mass reduction and not on c85...