Search results

BTW a lot of those Corvette guys hate the idea too, and no joke, they have people bring up Porsche to them as an example of the idea working too. 😂

Apparently on Reddit there was someone present at the meeting and said people chuckled and whispered when they showed the 4 door. We’ll see how it pans out

The mental gymnastics is crazy. At first I thought I was going crazy but comments on Instagram and Ford Authority reassured me that I’m in my right mind 😂

Mustang-150 🐎

Before that it was the little Omni thing which got a lot of heat at the time. Besides I wouldn’t use Dodge as an example of good decisions. 😂 after all Mustang is bigger then anything they’ve made in my opinion, and I say that as far as legacy and staying power. Only Ford with the Mustang and...

It’s always been based around a 2 door coupe though. Ford experimenting is good but this is just marketing. I think that’s why it bothers me. There’s a reason why Ford went back to the drawing board when the Probe was about to release as a Mustang. but in the end like I was saying earlier makes...

It’s like the big brother Fusion keeps telling you he has but you don’t believe him. 🤣

Bronco was originally made to be a SUV Mustang though wasn’t it, Farley and many others have brought it up a lot, along with the fact it was approved on the same day. They could’ve done that without the name though which is why sometimes I side eye Farley’s comments. This 4 door car will...

It’s not even a brand per se yet outside of the regular Mustang and all its variants and the Mach E which isn’t this knockout that Ford thought. Like I said a 4 door sedan isn’t bad, I don’t mind a Baja Mustang. I just don’t understand why it needs the Mustang name. Ford made some pretty...

They aren’t called the 911 though, the Porsche reference will never make sense in the context people are trying to use it in.

Mach 4 does sound like a AWD system. Lol Honestly has there ever been a Nameplate turned into a brand like that though? From a performance perspective.

I get that but you don’t have to strap the Mustang name on to every performance variant car to help boost sales. That’s the point I was getting at.

Not really the same thing. They already did it like Porsche with a Bronco, Falcon, Raptor and GT. Porsche doesn’t make a 911 4 door, EV Crossover and so on because it’s a nameplate with a certain ethos. They make a Panemara, Taycan, Macan, and Cayenne that embody some of the spirit but are for...

Watering down the nameplate. They cancelled the Falcon in Australia for the Mustang, killed off sedans and things because of sales, then try to push the Mustang name on those things.

I guess watering down the nameplate some more doesn’t really matter at this point. Lol.

Well yeah, then again Dodge is a one trick pony. Even their GM said they didn’t want to compete directly with Mustang and Camaro because they were better at making all around performing cars. That’s per a conference call all the Dodge channels were posting a couple months ago.

Yeah he’s talked about how iconic the name is and wants to essentially do what Porsche does with the 911. But he’s kind of everywhere with that logic. Looks like I have to save a little more, would’ve been less of a blow to me if they offered the tremec in the GT. Lol

I agree 100% I don’t get the obsession with needing to call it a Mustang. I saw someone on FB arguing that Mustang is a brand like Porsche, when it’s in fact more like a 911. They throw some that ethos on other cars but rename them to maintain the model recognition. Falcon itself like you were...

We did this stacked name thing as a joke. Lol But it should still be a Falcon https://www.thedrive.com/news/hey-ford-call-the-mustang-sedan-the-falcon

Didn’t he get mad or something too. Lol. Saw this thread and instantly thought about what you said