Definitely ICE.
The way the back cloth seems to go beyond the rear sheet metal, could be a new convertible (Dark Horse convertible?). Otherwise a BOSS or Bullitt.
We were? I missed that. The s550 has been the best looking Mustang in the past 49 years - by far. Why was a change so badly needed? This s650 'may' be a disappointment...
Teslas still suk.
But yes, when there's a car under $40K that can go over 400 miles with a charge, I'll have a look. But not before. ...and 10%? Try 70%. (and 'meeting needs' does not equal an auto maker telling me that I drive less than 200 miles per day, so an EV should be fine - I define...
'Daily Driver'? Living in Texas, you don't want to own any vehicle that can't go 300+ miles on any given weekend. it's a way of life. EVs suk. Teslas especially suk.
10% capacity loss is a hard pass for myself, and likely a part of why 75% of the population still is not interested in EVs. 20% capacity loss is totally unacceptable. And that's even before addressing the exaggerated false advertised claims regarding range.
But then again, Teslas are ugly AF.
Compared to to 2014, the s650 looks to have:
- A higher front fender above tire
- A higher beltline
- A lower rear tail
The 2014 s550 looked to have more rake and lower proportions in front - more like a wide, low 2-door sports car, where the s650 looks more like a slightly taller 2-door sedan...