Ok, lol. Two of the cars are 4-door sedans, three are compact sports cars with half the power, one is a compact 4-door hot-hatch, and one is a 2-seater convertible. Only three of those cars are in, or close to the same class. You are honestly going to argue those cars are all similar beyond...
Why only price? Because you are comparing the GT to a M2 which starts at $58,xxx vs the GT's $32,xxx, and saying if BMW can get size/weight down, so can Ford. Have you seen how a tightly a 3600lb. M2 is packaged? You pay for that technology up front, you pay with cost of ownership, and you...
The Mustang and M2 are in a completely different class. And there is a reason the M2's starting price is $23,000 more than a GT -- you pay to have the technology that allows you to down-size, light-weight, and package the car like a sardine can.
The BRZ/FRS has 1/2 the trunk space of a GT...
I wouldn't either. I think the Mustang would sell about as good as the FRS if the made it 5" narrower and 18" shorter, which is not very. I think SN95/New Edge would be a good size for most people -- right in between a S550 and a Fox.
18"?! That would make it 10" shorter than a Fox, and 11" shorter than a 1st Gen. Hell, it would be 5" shorter than a Mustang II, and only 3" longer than a Subaru FRS with its little flat-4.
I think everyone wants the Mustang to be somewhat smaller, but that is completely unrealistic -- a...
I have a fast car that is almost finished, and a slow vehicle -- best of both worlds.
1992 5.0LX SSP, 306, TFS stage II heads, cam, and intake, Vortech V-1, methanol injection.
Jeep is a 2000 TJ, 2" lift, full size Ford axles, 6" stretched wheelbase, 37" tires, full armor.